Re: pango and gucharmap

2008-04-09 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 17:26 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > Le mercredi 09 avril 2008, à 09:28 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : > > On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 11:32 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > > > Le mercredi 09 avril 2008, à 04:29 +0430, Behnam Esfahbod a écrit : > > > > Hey guys, > > > > > > > > On Wed

Re: pango and gucharmap

2008-04-09 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 09 avril 2008, à 09:28 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : > On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 11:32 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > > Le mercredi 09 avril 2008, à 04:29 +0430, Behnam Esfahbod a écrit : > > > Hey guys, > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:49 AM, Christian Persch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >

Re: pango and gucharmap

2008-04-09 Thread Claude Paroz
Le mercredi 09 avril 2008 à 10:28 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : > On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 17:26 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > > Le mercredi 09 avril 2008, à 09:28 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : > > > On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 11:32 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > > > > Le mercredi 09 avril 2008, à 04:29

Re: pango and gucharmap

2008-04-09 Thread Claude Paroz
Le mercredi 09 avril 2008 à 18:00 +0200, Christian Persch a écrit : > Hi; > > the new strings would be these unicode script and block names: > > > +msgid "Sundanese" > > +msgid "Lepcha" > > +msgid "Ol Chiki" > > +msgid "Cyrillic Extended-A" > > +msgid "Vai" > > +msgid "Cyrillic Extended-B"

Re: pango and gucharmap

2008-04-09 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 18:00 +0200, Christian Persch wrote: > Hi; > > the new strings would be these unicode script and block names: Most of these are names of minority scripts newly encoded in Unicode. I don't know the Persian translation for most them. I expect the same for most language teams

Re: pango and gucharmap

2008-04-09 Thread Christian Persch
Hi; the new strings would be these unicode script and block names: > +msgid "Sundanese" > +msgid "Lepcha" > +msgid "Ol Chiki" > +msgid "Cyrillic Extended-A" > +msgid "Vai" > +msgid "Cyrillic Extended-B" > +msgid "Saurashtra" > +msgid "Kayah Li" > +msgid "Rejang" > +msgid "Cham" > +msgi

Re: New team for Balochi(bal)

2008-04-09 Thread Claude Paroz
Le mardi 08 avril 2008 à 12:15 +0430, Mostafa Daneshvar a écrit : > Full Name: Mostafa Daneshvar > Bugzilla account: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Language: Balochi (bal) > mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Mostafa, The Team page has been set up: http://l10n.gnome.org/teams/bal Welcome in the GNOME Trans

Evince branched for 2.22

2008-04-09 Thread Carlos Garcia Campos
Evince has been branched for 2.22. The main goal for this cycle is finally adding annotations support. More info in the Roadmap (http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap/Evince) -- Carlos Garcia Campos [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://carlosgc.linups.org PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371

Re: pango and gucharmap

2008-04-09 Thread Simos Xenitellis
Christian Persch wrote: > Hi; > > the new strings would be these unicode script and block names: > > >> +msgid "Sundanese" >> +msgid "Lepcha" >> +msgid "Ol Chiki" >> +msgid "Cyrillic Extended-A" >> +msgid "Vai" >> +msgid "Cyrillic Extended-B" >> +msgid "Saurashtra" >> +msgid "Kayah Li" >

Re: pango and gucharmap

2008-04-09 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 19:21 +0100, Simos Xenitellis wrote: > > Q. Anyway, are there fonts available for these new Unicode scripts? This is a GNOME release, not a Fedora release. By releasing a Unicode 5.1 gucharmap now we actually help people develop fonts for the new scripts. -- behdad http:/

String additions to 'libgnome.HEAD'

2008-04-09 Thread GNOME Status Pages
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: http://l10n.gnome.org/. There have been following string additions to module 'libgnome.HEAD': + "Maximum age for thumbnails in the cache, in days. Set to -1 to disable cleaning." + "Maximum size of the thumbnail cac

Re: String additions to 'libgnome.HEAD'

2008-04-09 Thread Marcel Telka
Hi Michael, this your commit added two new strings into libgnome trunk (trunk is now string frozen): http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/libgnome?view=revision&revision=3704 It looks like we need to branch libgnome for GNOME 2.22. Thanks. On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:48:37PM +0100, GNOME Status Pages wr