Re: Do "enabled", "disabled", and "not found" need to be qualified per instance?

2010-05-17 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Montag, den 17.05.2010, 00:33 +0200 schrieb Wouter Bolsterlee: > Short note about number/plurals: as far as I know, proper use of ngettext() > and friends correctly handle this case for all languages. This pattern works > really well for many language and is used in various Gnome modules: > >

Please add Caribou to damned-lies

2010-05-17 Thread Andre Klapper
Hi, can somebody please add the module "caribou" to damned-lies on l10n.gnome.org? Thanks in advance, andre -- mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http

Re: Complaint of the Slovak coordinator

2010-05-17 Thread Jiri Eischmann
__ > Od: "Mattias Põldaru" > Komu: heli...@centrum.sk > CC: gnome-i18n@gnome.org, gnome-sk-l...@gnome.org > Datum: 17.05.2010 02:35 > Předmět: Re: Complaint of the Slovak coordinator > >Ühel kenal päeval, E, 2010-05-17 kell 02:16, kirjut

Re: Complaint of the Slovak coordinator

2010-05-17 Thread Mattias Põldaru
Ühel kenal päeval, E, 2010-05-17 kell 10:23, kirjutas Jiri Eischmann: > __ > > Od: "Mattias Põldaru" > > Komu: heli...@centrum.sk > > CC: gnome-i18n@gnome.org, gnome-sk-l...@gnome.org > > Datum: 17.05.2010 02:35 > > Předmět: Re: Complaint

Re: Complaint of the Slovak coordinator

2010-05-17 Thread Peter Tuhársky
Hi, translation team. (I re-post enhanced version of my former mail to this thread). I am former translator from slovak team. I ceased translating after considerable translation efforts that just partially landed in the project. The main reason of my leaving was that I ran out of time that I wa

Re: Please add Caribou to damned-lies

2010-05-17 Thread Claude Paroz
Le lundi 17 mai 2010 à 10:06 +0200, Andre Klapper a écrit : > Hi, > > can somebody please add the module "caribou" to damned-lies on > l10n.gnome.org? > > Thanks in advance, > andre Done: http://l10n.gnome.org/module/caribou/ Claude ___ gnome-i18n ma

Re: Complaint of the Slovak coordinator

2010-05-17 Thread helix84
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:40, Mattias Põldaru wrote: > Ühel kenal päeval, E, 2010-05-17 kell 10:23, kirjutas Jiri Eischmann: > Although, somewhat interesting is what helix84 says: "I would not agree > to Marcel staying the only commiter, in any case", which sounds much > like a personal issue to

Re: Complaint of the Slovak coordinator

2010-05-17 Thread Jiri Eischmann
__ > Od: "Mattias Põldaru" > Komu: Jiri Eischmann > CC: gnome-i18n , gnome-sk-list > Datum: 17.05.2010 10:49 > Předmět: Re: Complaint of the Slovak coordinator >Although, somewhat interesting is what helix84 says: "I would not agree >

[dasher] Created branch gnome-2-30

2010-05-17 Thread Patrick Welche
The branch 'gnome-2-30' was created pointing to: 141f648... Updated Shavian transliteration ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

String additions to 'dasher.master'

2010-05-17 Thread GNOME Status Pages
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: http://l10n.gnome.org. There have been following string additions to module 'dasher.master': + "Curve lines to follow the non-linearity of the view transform" + "Draw guides on screen to show area into which a click will zoo

Re: Translation Coordination Team

2010-05-17 Thread Og Maciel
Hi Johannes, > As nobody objected I would propose that you add yourself to the team! > > Thanks for your help! Thank you! :) I have just added my name to the list and am now ready to help out. Is there a ToDo list or a issue queue that I can take a look at? Thanks in advance, -- Og B. Maciel o

Announcing the coordination team mailing list

2010-05-17 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi! For convenience there is a i18n-coordination-l...@gnome.org mailing list now for internal discussion of the coordination team. This is simply to avoid CC'ing of 10 people all the time. This is a private mailing list without an archive. Unless you are in the coordination team you cannot subscri

Re: Complaint of the Slovak coordinator

2010-05-17 Thread Wouter Bolsterlee
Op maandag 17-05-2010 om 06:24 uur [tijdzone +], schreef j...@jsschmid.de: > > So, to elaborate on your suggestion, the team would be split [...] > Sorry, splitting teams is a no-go in gnome-i18n policies. Be sure that the > coordination team is taking the whole thing very serious and will try

Re: Do "enabled", "disabled", and "not found" need to be qualified per instance?

2010-05-17 Thread Wouter Bolsterlee
Op maandag 17-05-2010 om 09:41 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Andre Klapper: > Am Montag, den 17.05.2010, 00:33 +0200 schrieb Wouter Bolsterlee: > > Short note about number/plurals: as far as I know, proper use of ngettext() > > and friends correctly handle this case for all languages. This pattern

Re: Complaint of the Slovak coordinator

2010-05-17 Thread Laco Gubík
Hi Wouter, Thanks for update. I would like to ask why is this discussed in private? Johannes said that the new ML will be only for coordinators, so I assume that you are discussing this there. Does this also mean that Marcel, as Coordinator of Slovak team, is discussing this with you and we are e

Re: Complaint of the Slovak coordinator

2010-05-17 Thread Wouter Bolsterlee
Op maandag 17-05-2010 om 19:57 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Laco Gubík: > Thanks for update. I would like to ask why is this discussed in private? The coordination team feels that the discussion is too heated already. We are currently considering our options, but we do so in private because we ha

Fwd: Complaint of the Slovak coordinator

2010-05-17 Thread Laco Gubík
Forwarding here as I have originally sent this only to Mattias -- Forwarded message -- From: Laco Gubík Date: 17 May 2010 21:18 Subject: Re: Complaint of the Slovak coordinator To: Mattias Põldaru On 17 May 2010 01:04, Mattias Põldaru wrote: > Ühel kenal päeval, P, 2010-05-16

Re: Complaint of the Slovak coordinator

2010-05-17 Thread Laco Gubík
Hi, Like I mentioned in my previous email, I just want to clarify some misleading statements in Marcel's answers. On 13 May 2010 11:05, Marcel Telka wrote: > Hi all, > > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 09:30:01PM +0200, Peter Mraz wrote: >> Hi all, >> I have been advised to write an email to this mailin

Re: Complaint of the Slovak coordinator

2010-05-17 Thread Marcel Telka
Hi, On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 01:19:11AM +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote: > Hi! > > > That's true. But if you have users, it does not automatically mean > > you'll have bug reports. Yes, you'll get some of them but it is not > > clear if it would be enough. From the past I know most of translation > >

Re: Complaint of the Slovak coordinator

2010-05-17 Thread helix84
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 22:54, Laco Gubík wrote: > Not true, helix84 is with team longer, at least from 2007. It also You're wrong, Laco, technically I joined the team in June 2009 http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-sk-list/2009-June/msg00070.html Although I translated Dia in 2007 that was bef

Re: Complaint of the Slovak coordinator

2010-05-17 Thread Laco Gubík
My apologies, based on your email from 2007 I thought you were member since then. Laco On 17 May 2010 23:05, helix84 wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 22:54, Laco Gubík wrote: >> Not true, helix84 is with team longer, at least from 2007. It also > > You're wrong, Laco, technically I joined the t

Re: Complaint of the Slovak coordinator

2010-05-17 Thread Marcel Telka
Hi, On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:03:32PM +0100, Laco Gubík wrote: > I' m member of Slovak team and I completely agree with points raised > by Johannes. > > Trust - this is big issue because Marcel will not commit anything > unless he checks it, even if it would be checked by four other people. > Th

Re: Complaint of the Slovak coordinator

2010-05-17 Thread Marcel Telka
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 01:20:21AM +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote: > Hi! > > > > [1] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-sk-list/2010-April/msg00096.html The latest version of the document is at: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-sk-list/2010-April/msg00141.html > I know that is probably a pr