Hi!
> Sure, now I see that there are devhelp messages as well. I don't blame
> you for fixing this, obviously, but I do think it is disrespectful to
> translators that NONE of the developers on either of the development
> teams thought to look for this before now.
That is far from easy to catch.
Hi!
> Incidentally, "alfanumeric" should be "alphanumeric".
If nobody comes up, I will fix that later (and update all translations
using some sed magic.
Regards,
Johannes
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/l
Op Do, 2010-09-23 om 09:53 +0200 skryf Johannes Schmid:
> Hi!
>
> > Sure, now I see that there are devhelp messages as well. I don't blame
> > you for fixing this, obviously, but I do think it is disrespectful to
> > translators that NONE of the developers on either of the development
> > teams th
Hi!
> It isn't necessary to review things by hand only. I wrote a page on the
> wiki a while ago about testing i18n. A big part of this is about
> spotting strings not marked for translation:
This is even more manually actually. In a 100 000+ lines applications you
hardly ever see every dialog.
Hi, i18n team.
Given the response I got from
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630422 I ask beast to be
removed from DL. It must be translated using transifex, according to its
author.
Thanks,
--
Jonh Wendell
http://www.bani.com.br
___
gnome-
Hi!
> Given the response I got from
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630422 I ask beast to be
> removed from DL. It must be translated using transifex, according to its
> author.
The far more important question is if we might want to migrate to some
better infrastructure or modernize
Le jeudi 23 septembre 2010 à 13:55 -0300, Jonh Wendell a écrit :
> Hi, i18n team.
>
> Given the response I got from
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630422 I ask beast to be
> removed from DL. It must be translated using transifex, according to its
> author.
OK, removed from DL.
Ther
Hallo guys
How about looking for it at commit time?
What I was thinking is that, afaik the strings that are marked for
translation are done so with a special syntax. So we should be able to
look for strings that are not marked for translation. If that can be
scripted, then maybe we can include th
Hi localization teams!
In the better late than never category, the Release Notes are now ready for
translation. They are in the release-notes repo in the gnome-2-32 branch.
I sincerely apologize for the delay in getting these ready for you.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Paul
__
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Paul Cutler wrote:
> Hi localization teams!
> In the better late than never category, the Release Notes are now ready for
> translation. They are in the release-notes repo in the gnome-2-32 branch.
> I sincerely apologize for the delay in getting these ready for y
typo?
diff --git a/help/C/rnlookingforward.xml b/help/C/rnlookingforward.xml
index 07db4a1..cd227a8 100644
--- a/help/C/rnlookingforward.xml
+++ b/help/C/rnlookingforward.xml
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
and the GNOME Activity Journal which easily helps you browse
and find files on your com
another typo in rndevelopers.xml?
diff --git a/help/C/rndevelopers.xml b/help/C/rndevelopers.xml
index 5eb2573..f0d9672 100644
--- a/help/C/rndevelopers.xml
+++ b/help/C/rndevelopers.xml
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
Glib also includes new support for dtrace and systemtap
static markers;
12 matches
Mail list logo