Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N

2010-10-16 Thread daniel g. siegel
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 03:05 +0200, Kenneth Nielsen wrote: 2010/10/15 daniel g. siegel dgsie...@gnome.org: On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:47 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote: Hi! As much as I'd like to claim it, I don't think we can achieve everything with a single shot. :-) Maintainers of GNOME

[gnome-applets] Created branch gnome-2-32

2010-10-16 Thread Enrico Minack
The branch 'gnome-2-32' was created pointing to: 083437e... [release] 2.32.0 ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

Survey results (yay!)

2010-10-16 Thread Gil Forcada
Hi! I'm really proud (and shamed for the delay) to finally present to all of you the first survey to our GNOME i18n community! First of all, a BIG THANK YOU!! to all coordinators who replied [0] Quick links: - raw data: [1] - ods with all the data gathered: [2] [3] [4] I wholeheartedly

Re: Transifex instance for GNOME

2010-10-16 Thread Gil Forcada
Hi sysadmins. I'm quite sure you are aware of the new moduleset proposal made by the release team and the discussion that started at the gnome-i18n mailing list about how to support external modules not hosted on GNOME infrastructure. In the following mail Claude says that Damned-Lies the

Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N

2010-10-16 Thread Mișu Moldovan
Kenneth Nielsen k.nielse...@gmail.com a scris: [snip] In the case of clutter core, which I believe was the module that got this discussion started again, Emmanuele said the following: now, how do we go from here to there is probably worth discussing. I cannot move Clutter to gnome.org; it's

Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N

2010-10-16 Thread Gil Forcada
El dv 15 de 10 de 2010 a les 13:29 -0500, en/na Diego Escalante Urrelo va escriure: El vie, 15-10-2010 a las 08:29 -0700, Sandy Armstrong escribió: I'm not a fan myself, but I can see how once a project was already hooked on a Launchpad-oriented process, it would be work to migrate to

Re: Transifex instance for GNOME

2010-10-16 Thread Paul Cutler
Alexandro Silva had been working on this. Alexandro, do you have any updates? The original bug was https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599066 Thanks. Paul On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Gil Forcada gforc...@gnome.org wrote: Hi sysadmins. I'm quite sure you are aware of the new

Translations to be commited- Manx

2010-10-16 Thread Manx Translators
Hello all, Can someone please commit the following translations at http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/empathy/gnome-2-32/po/gv and athttp://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/empathy/master/po/gv . Thankyou. Reuben Potts ___ gnome-i18n mailing list

Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N

2010-10-16 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 15 octobre 2010, à 17:02 +0200, daniel g. siegel a écrit : On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:47 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote: Hi! As much as I'd like to claim it, I don't think we can achieve everything with a single shot. :-) Maintainers of GNOME modules hosted outside of

Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N

2010-10-16 Thread Germán Póo-Caamaño
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 15:53 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: Le vendredi 15 octobre 2010, à 17:02 +0200, daniel g. siegel a écrit : On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:47 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote: Hi! As much as I'd like to claim it, I don't think we can achieve everything with a single shot.

2010 Q3 GNOME Quarterly Report

2010-10-16 Thread Petr Kovar
Hi all, It's October, so we are asked to provide a GNOME Localization update for the upcoming 2010 Q3 GNOME Quarterly Report. The draft that I've made up so far follows. If you think something is not correct or missing (I have a feeling it might not be perfect), please feel free to share your

Re: Transifex instance for GNOME

2010-10-16 Thread Petr Kovar
Hi all! Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de, Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:06:39 +0200 (CEST): Hi! I'm absolutely not opposed to such an idea. But I'm also not convinced that we will be able to keep current D-L functionalities. However if we get some new ones, maybe the global balance might still be