Yes sorry, I meant 2/2
El jue., 22 sept. 2022 16:51, Milan Crha via gnome-i18n <
gnome-i18n@gnome.org> escribió:
> On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 15:28 +0200, Daniel Mustieles García wrote:
> > 1/2 from i18n
>
> Hi,
> I guess it's meant to be 2/2, as Alexandre gave the first one, thus
> I'll commi
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 5:23 PM Milan Crha via gnome-i18n
wrote:
> I see your string checker discovered two more strings:
>
>+ "Send / Receive"
>+ "toolbar-button"::"New"
I extend my approval to these strings. Thanks for the being responsive.
--
Alexandre Franke
GNOME Hacker
___
On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 16:49 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> I guess it's meant to be 2/2, as Alexandre gave the first one, thus
> I'll commit the change shortly. Thank you both.
Hi again,
I see your string checker discovered two more strings:
+ "Send / Receive"
+ "toolbar-button"::"New"
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
https://l10n.gnome.org.
There have been following string additions to module 'evolution.gnome-43':
+ "%s — Evolution"
+ "Controls the toolbar icon size. The 'default' value lets the system/code
decide what is the best icon
On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 15:28 +0200, Daniel Mustieles García wrote:
> 1/2 from i18n
Hi,
I guess it's meant to be 2/2, as Alexandre gave the first one, thus
I'll commit the change shortly. Thank you both.
Bye,
Milan
___
gnome-i18n m
1/2 from i18n
Regards
El jue, 22 sept 2022 a las 12:53, Alexandre Franke ()
escribió:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:41 PM Milan Crha via gnome-i18n
> wrote:
> > > I suppose the other new strings about icon size in the commit are not
> > > going to be backported.
> >
> > I thought of using both
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:41 PM Milan Crha via gnome-i18n
wrote:
> > I suppose the other new strings about icon size in the commit are not
> > going to be backported.
>
> I thought of using both options, to have 1:1 correspondence of the
> change between the stable and the development branch, but
Hi,
On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 12:30 +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> For my fellow i18n coordinator who will try to assess the situation
> like I just did: the link is to an issue that’s closed. It links to a
> related MR, which has been merged a while ago and is not what Milan
> is trying to
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 11:45 AM Milan Crha via gnome-i18n
wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
> I'd like to ask for a string freeze break approval for the 'evolution'
> project for the gnome-43 branch in order to apply change for [1] to it.
For my fellow i18n coordinator who will try to assess the sit
Hello,
I'd like to ask for a string freeze break approval for the 'evolution'
project for the gnome-43 branch in order to apply change for [1] to it.
Background: there had been added use of header bars (client side
decorations) on the most used windows of the application for the .beta
GNOM
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
https://l10n.gnome.org.
There have been following string additions to module 'simple-scan.master':
+ "Flip even pages upside-down"
+ "Flip odd pages upside-down"
Note that this doesn't directly indicate a string freeze brea
11 matches
Mail list logo
