Request string freeze break in gnome-media

I would like to request a string freeze change for GNOME 2.26. Note that if you do not have PulseAudio, that it is now impossible to configure Sound Themes. This is because the new Sound Theme configuration has been moved to the new PulseAudio-only gnome-volume-control. When not using PulseAud

Re: String additions to 'gnome-media.HEAD'

Frederic: Sorry about this. I just asked for approval. I will backout the change if I do not get approval. Or, perhaps, I could just make the tab use the existing "Sound Theme:" string. It's a little awkward to have the ":" in the tab label, but it is better than not having the functionality

Re: Request string freeze break in gnome-media

Johannes Schmid va escriure: Hi! Although this is really late I guess we need to avoid such a regression for 2.26 as some people seem to dislike PulseAudio for various reasons. 1 of 2 from i18n. Regards, Johannes Am Freitag, den 06.03.2009, 10:44 -0600 schrieb Brian Cameron: I would like to

Re: String additions to 'gdm.master'

Claude: Actually, I will back out that fix before releasing the 2.28.0 tarball. No worries. Brian On 09/11/09 04:02, Claude Paroz wrote: Le jeudi 10 septembre 2009 à 01:13 +, GNOME Status Pages a écrit : This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: http://l10n.gn

Re: String additions to 'gdm.master'

Kenneth: Actually, I will back out that fix before releasing the 2.28.0 tarball. No worries. Actually, that's not good enough. The string freeze period is, among other things, there to ensure that translators have something stable to work on for the last few weeks before release, without stri

Re: [gdm-list] String additions to 'gdm.gnome-2-30'

Claude/i18n team: This is regarding the outstanding GDM 2.30.3 release. Just to follow up, is it possible to have someone from the i18n team programmatically fix the msgid and msgstr strings to remove the underscore (or the "(_K)" from msgstr for non-Latin languages) for the following strings:

gdm2 branched

The stable branch for gdm2 is gnome-2-14, HEAD is now released from freezes. Brian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

gdm2 branched for GNOME 2.16

GDM is branched for GNOME 2.16, the branch is called gnome-2-16. Future development work and bug fixing will be done in CVS head. Brian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

Re: GDM2 doc module looks wierd

Danilo: Thanks for catching this. I believe I have fixed this in SVN head. Brian > Today at 18:54, Daniel Nylander wrote: > >> Ermm.. some problems with the GDM2 doc module. >> Number of strings has fallen from 1000+ to 64 and it looks wierd. >> >> http://progress.gnome.org/POT/gdm2.HEAD/docs

GDM branched for 2.18

Everyone: Yesterday I branched GDM for 2.18, sorry for the late notice. 2.19 develoment now going on in HEAD. Brian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

GDM branches for 2.20

GDM2 has been branched for GNOME 2.20. Brian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

Re: String additions to 'gdm2.gnome-2-20'

Claude/Others: Apologies for breaking string freeze in GDM 2.20. However, I think that this change is acceptable for the following reasons, mainly reason #2 which is a security issue. I think, in this case, security trumps translation. However, I do recognize that I should have sent an email t

Re: String additions to 'gdm2.gnome-2-20'

Johannes: >> Formally, we need a second approval though. >> And please, next time ask before committing! > > Second approval of i18n-team! Thanks. > I would also agree not to translate these debug messages. I think this also makes the most sense. Those doing translations shouldn't be bother

Re: String additions to 'gdm.gnome-2-20'

Deniz: Sorry, backed out that change. Brian > On Nov 14, 2007 8:44 PM, GNOME Status Pages <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: >> http://l10n.gnome.org/. >> >> There have been following string additions to module 'gdm.gnome-2-20'

Break string freeze for GDM 2.20

I would like to request a string freeze break for GDM 2.20. Since GDM 2.22 was not approved for inclusion in GNOME 2.22, I would like to get some fixes into GDM 2.20 that would be nice to address, but affect strings. I plan to do a new GDM 2.20 release sometime in the near future so that people

Re: Break string freeze for GDM 2.20

Deniz/Claude: Thanks, the changes are now committed. So now the docs and i18n team can help to translate these small changes. I think it is nice to get these fixes into GDM 2.20. Brian >> As this contains some security implication, I would say this is worth >> committing, as if we don't do

Issue with two strings in GDM L10N

L10N team: It was recently reported that there is a problem translating two strings in GDM. They are currently marked for translation, but I think improperly. You can read more in the bug report. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=519528 Refer to comment #10 for a description of the

Break string freeze again for GDM 2.20

It was recently reported that there is a problem translating two strings in GDM. The two strings are the default welcome and remote welcome strings that are shown to the user on the GDM dialog. These strings are currently marked for translation, but improperly. So although these strings are tr

Re: Break string freeze again for GDM 2.20

t of GDM just to get the strings translated. I'm not sure this is the best way, but I can also use a different technique if someone has a better suggestion. The patch you discuss below is the patch that was already approved by the release team a few days ago. Brian > Am Freitag, den 07.03

Re: Break string freeze again for GDM 2.20

Wouter: Great idea. I wrote the attached patch to fix the problem more cleanly based on your suggestion. Does this look right to you? Can I get approval to add translations for these two strings? Thanks, Brian 2008-03-07 klockan 23:06 skrev Brian Cameron: I think you are looking at the

Re: Break string freeze again for GDM 2.20

Wouter: > No, the gui/gdmcommon.c part of the patch is wrong. The N_() macro > only *marks* for translation, without actually doing any translations > (that's why you can use it in static array initializers, #defines, and > such). It's just there so that intltool knows that the string should > be

Re: Break string freeze again for GDM 2.20

Wouter: I'm removing the gnome-docs-team and release-team from the cc:list since we are now talking about how to better implement this feature, and this isn't a concern for string breakage anymore. > 2008-03-10 klockan 20:44 skrev Brian Cameron: >> Thanks for explaining. I u

Re: Break string freeze again for GDM 2.20

Wouter: Thanks for reviewing the code. I will test, and we can discuss further if there are any problems. If there is any other suggestions you have, please let me know. Thanks again, Brian > 2008-03-11 klockan 21:08 skrev Brian Cameron: >> I tried this and the code does no

Re: [gdm-list] GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

Will: While I disagree with Brian's assessment (I think he tends to lean more to the 'it's OK as long as an able-bodied sysadmin can configure the system for the disabled user' side than the 'let the user be independent' side), I'll support the decision nonetheless. I agree with you that "l

Re: [gdm-list] GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

Willie: While I disagree with Brian's assessment (I think he tends to lean more to the 'it's OK as long as an able-bodied sysadmin can configure the system for the disabled user' side than the 'let the user be independent' side), I'll support the decision nonetheless. I wasn't trying to spe

Re: [gdm-list] GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

Gil: Just thinking about it ... Wouldn't it be reasonable to enable everything the first time the user logs in and the if no accessible technology has been used ask if they have to be turned off by default (and with a little explain about how to re-enable them)? From a usability standpoint,

Re: [gdm-list] GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

Peter: Agreed. The solution you suggest is in the works. By solving the problem in gnome-settings-daemon, the solution should work the same way in both the GNOME session and in GDM, so it will be a huge improvement over what existed before (a GDM-only solution which was typically turned off by

Better i18n/gdm2 interaction

There are a few gdm2 bugs that seem to relate to i18n that I'm unsure how to fix and was wondering if someone could provide some hints or otherwise help out. 54667 - Fine grained locale selection. Users should have the ability to select different locale things (monetary/dates/etc). Not

Re: gdm2 string freeze breakage

is change. I didn't realize that this was a string freeze issue. Furthermore, it is this message: #: gui/gdmsetup.c:2191 msgid "_Remove Theme" The relevant parts of the big ChangeLog entry seems to be these: Fri Mar 04 12:50:00 2005 Brian Camero

gdm branched for 2.10

The gdm2 module has been branched for GNOME 2.10 ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

Re: gdm2 string freeze breakage

Abel/i18n team: There are two affected messages. First of all, it is this added message: #: gui/gdmlanguages.c:83 msgid "A-M|Chinese (HongKong)" Which, AFAIK, includes a typo. It is supossed to read "Hong Kong", right? You are right. I'm from Hong Kong too, so let me express my op

Re: gdm2 commit error

Adam: Hi Brian, It seems you have only "tagged" GDM2 with "gnome-2-10", instead of branching. That might have happend if you missed "-b" flag in "cvs tag" command. I don't know how easy it is to resolve this in CVS (can one have same branch and tag names?). No, but luckily removing a tag is much,

Re: [Fwd: GDM Login - Cinnabar Linux]

Honza: maybe I was not clear in my previous question. All locales what are in gdmlanguages.c file appear in GDM login (i.e. including French) on Cinnabar Linux build 32. Great. I thought you included French in the list of missing languages in your previous email. I must have misread. But my quest