Umm, why?
How can you possibly be tagging anything but the exact tree that was
used to build the code against which the testers verified?
If you are doing anything else, then you do not have a verifyable build.
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 13:54 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> 2. The curtains are
On that file, EVOLUTION_2_4_0 is tagged on revision 1.2240, but the
evolution-2-4-0 branch is actually rooted on revision 1.2231.
The same problem seems to have occured with mail/ChangeLog,
mail/default/C/Inbox, and probably by extension any file that was
changed.
Looks like HEAD was tagged, and
You should check the url is not "" before trying to resolve it.
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 07:55 +0530, Shreyas Sriniavasan wrote:
> + if (!(store = (CamelOfflineStore *) camel_session_get_service
> (session, e_account_get_string(account, E_ACCOUNT_SOURCE_URL),
> CAMEL_PROVIDER_STORE, &ex))) {
Hi,
We have some values that are in a table, like:
Total messages: xx
Unread messages: xx
Dobey got carried away and made it an ngettext() thing, which breaks in
English of course (maybe it's correct in American!). Is it appropriate
to just use the 1 string for a table like this, for other la
Hi guys,
I need to change a couple of strings in evolution:
! em_format_format_error(emf, stream, ex->desc?("Could not parse
S/MIME message"):_("Could not parse S/MIME message: Unknown error"));
To:
! em_format_format_error(emf, stream, ex->desc?_("Error decrypting
Sorry guys some more strings in evolution, I think:
"_Window"
"Hide S_elected Messages"
"Hide _Read Messages"
"Sh_ow Hidden Messages"
(from a reverted patch)
Michael
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/l
Hi guys,
The following 2 strings have been added to evolution cvs, at least in
up-to-date tranlsations:
"Checking for new mail"
and
"Unable to retrieve message"
Regards,
Michael
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org
> > Most of these strings were already translated as part of evolution-
> > exchange changes, but have now been moved to either of evolution or
> > evolution-data-server. So, i am not sure if retranslation would be
> > needed. Most of these strings should only be in evolution, and we are
> > tryin
Hmm, why on earth didn't i think of actually running make ... oh well.
Just committed fixes for that and a couple of the other ones which also
broke.
Sorry about that.
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 08:40 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> On 6/21/05, Not Zed wrote:
> >
> > Lads,
&g
Oh - I didn't copy across the Thai or Bangla translations from gal, they
seemed out of date anyway, and contain far fewer strings than evolution,
so wouldn't be much use I think.
Michael
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 13:06 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> Ok guys, I will be starting the merg
Lads,
Alright, i've committed it. Monster commit too, so hopefully all is
right.
Regards,
Michael
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 13:06 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> Ok guys, I will be starting the merge in the next couple of hours, i'll
> let you know when its done. Hopefully you're
Ok guys, I will be starting the merge in the next couple of hours, i'll
let you know when its done. Hopefully you're all sleeping now and can
wake up to it all complete (and hopefully not f*kd up).
Cheers,
Michael
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 02:10 +0200, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> Yesterday at 9:04, Kaus
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 11:41 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> Le vendredi 06 mai 2005 à 11:25 +0530, Not Zed a écrit :
> >
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I've worked out a sane method for i18n for eplugins using similar
> > mechanisms to other xml data. Incl
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 18:37 +0200, Danilo Šegan wrote:
Today at 15:31, Not Zed wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 16:57 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
>
>> We've put the default inbox for translation in evolution/mail/default,
>> however I know the translation teams aren'
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 18:37 +0200, Danilo Šegan wrote:
Today at 15:31, Not Zed wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 16:57 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
>
>> We've put the default inbox for translation in evolution/mail/default,
>> however I know the translation teams aren'
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 16:57 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 11:48 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> Sorry if this is a newbie question...
>
> I'm working on the Templates support. In order to learn the code, and
> as a first try at an implementation, I'm starting by making a copy o
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 16:57 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 11:48 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> Sorry if this is a newbie question...
>
> I'm working on the Templates support. In order to learn the code, and
> as a first try at an implementation, I'm starting by making a copy o
Well you asked for an opinion.
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 01:15 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 09:10 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
>
> My opinion is 'who cares', its only for the registry editor, which
> shouldn't ever be being used anyway, if all things are w
Well you asked for an opinion.
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 01:15 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 09:10 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
>
> My opinion is 'who cares', its only for the registry editor, which
> shouldn't ever be being used anyway, if all things are w
My opinion is 'who cares', its only for the registry editor, which shouldn't ever be being used anyway, if all things are working properly.
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 12:27 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
When looking at 61075 I noticed some inconsistency/issues with our
schema files. I also looked
My opinion is 'who cares', its only for the registry editor, which shouldn't ever be being used anyway, if all things are working properly.
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 12:27 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
When looking at 61075 I noticed some inconsistency/issues with our
schema files. I also looked
evolution/mail/searchtypes.xml
new string "Subject or Sender contains"
i think that is all in the file
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
22 matches
Mail list logo
