Re: Gimp Translation

2014-07-29 Thread scl
Hi Denis, On 29.7.2014 at 7:39 PM Denis Dendenis wrote: Hi, I`m Den. I`d like to translate Gimp stuff to Ukrainian language and I`m looking for someone who can drive me in right direction. Help me please. this is the place to go: https://l10n.gnome.org/teams/uk/ To get in touch with the

Re: [PATCH] Gettext 0.19 errors; Workflow for irregular i18n contributors

2014-06-27 Thread scl
On 27.6.2014 at 8:02 AM Gil Forcada wrote: Additionally to the last discussed status I corrected the language codes in c...@valencia.po to ca-XV and b...@latin.po to be-latin. as a Catalan language coordinator, please fix the language code for ca@valencia. Is ca@valencia not ca-XV. XV does

Re: [PATCH] Gettext 0.19 errors; Workflow for irregular i18n contributors

2014-06-26 Thread scl
Hi, thank you, Piotr, for reviewing. On 25.6.2014 at 7:08 PM Piotr Drąg wrote: Looks good to me. I think you should file a bug against gtk+ at this point. General component should do fine. Please send the bug number here when you do it. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732311

Re: [PATCH] Gettext 0.19 errors; Workflow for irregular i18n contributors

2014-06-24 Thread scl
Hi, On 14.6.2014 at 4:49 PM Piotr Drąg wrote: I see, you want to fix the gtk-2-24 branch. I'm afraid it is low on the list of priorities. Couldn't you build GIMP with gettext 0.18.x until it's ported to GTK+3? No, unfortunately not. There is one bug we need gettext 0.19+ for:

[PATCH] Gettext 0.19 errors; Workflow for irregular i18n contributors

2014-06-14 Thread scl
Hi, a few days ago, after an update to GNU Gettext 0.19, 'msgfmt -c' started failing because of missing po header info. The Language: entry was missing in some po files and some Language-Team: entries missed the trailing \n. The newer Gettext 0.19.1 behaves a bit more tolerant and returns only

Re: [PATCH] Gettext 0.19 errors; Workflow for irregular i18n contributors

2014-06-14 Thread scl
Hi Piotr, first of all thank you for your feedback! Indeed there are some errors in my patch which I overlooked. Four eyes see more than two. On 14.6.2014 at 2:52 PM Piotr Drąg wrote: First, it uses an out of date checkout of the GTK+ repository. Indeed my patch is based upon GTK 2.24.23