Re: [+gnome] Re: Format specifier (re)ordering in Python

2009-02-11 Thread Willie Walker
I don't mean it as an insult - sorry about that. I listen to gnome-i18n and will gladly follow a decree. Those kinds of things are usually made for consistency purposes and such. So, if they are needed, I will do them. You guys do good work. Will Wouter Bolsterlee wrote: 2009-02-11 klock

Re: [+gnome] Re: Format specifier (re)ordering in Python (was: String change for orca)

2009-02-11 Thread Wouter Bolsterlee
2009-02-11 klockan 21:58 skrev Willie Walker: > But, if the gnome-i18n team makes a decree that thou shalt always use > format specifier reordering, [...] Hi Willie, No worries, if your current approach to this specific case works, by all means leave it like it currently is. It's simpler after

Re: [+gnome] Re: Format specifier (re)ordering in Python (was: String change for orca)

2009-02-11 Thread Wouter Bolsterlee
2009-02-11 klockan 22:03 skrev Marcel Telka: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:37:20PM +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote: > > There is one downside though: translators MUST NOT translate the keywords > Isn't this checked by the msgfmt command? If not, it should be, IMHO. > Bug in gettext? If I recall corr

Re: [+gnome] Re: Format specifier (re)ordering in Python (was: String change for orca)

2009-02-11 Thread Marcel Telka
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:07:25PM +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote: > 2009-02-11 klockan 22:03 skrev Marcel Telka: > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:37:20PM +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote: > > > There is one downside though: translators MUST NOT translate the keywords > > Isn't this checked by the msgf