El dv 27 de 06 de 2014 a les 07:03 +0200, en/na scl va escriure:
Hi,
thank you, Piotr, for reviewing.
On 25.6.2014 at 7:08 PM Piotr Drąg wrote:
Looks good to me. I think you should file a bug against gtk+ at this
point. General component should do fine. Please send the bug number
On 27.6.2014 at 8:02 AM Gil Forcada wrote:
Additionally to the last discussed status I corrected the language
codes in c...@valencia.po to ca-XV and b...@latin.po to be-latin.
as a Catalan language coordinator, please fix the language code for
ca@valencia. Is ca@valencia not ca-XV. XV does
Hi,
thank you, Piotr, for reviewing.
On 25.6.2014 at 7:08 PM Piotr Drąg wrote:
Looks good to me. I think you should file a bug against gtk+ at this
point. General component should do fine. Please send the bug number
here when you do it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732311
2014-06-25 6:35 GMT+02:00 scl scl.gp...@gmail.com:
I see, you want to fix the gtk-2-24 branch. I'm afraid it is low on
the list of priorities. Couldn't you build GIMP with gettext 0.18.x
until it's ported to GTK+3?
No, unfortunately not. There is one bug we need gettext 0.19+ for:
Hi,
On 14.6.2014 at 4:49 PM Piotr Drąg wrote:
I see, you want to fix the gtk-2-24 branch. I'm afraid it is low on
the list of priorities. Couldn't you build GIMP with gettext 0.18.x
until it's ported to GTK+3?
No, unfortunately not. There is one bug we need gettext 0.19+ for:
Hi,
a few days ago, after an update to GNU Gettext 0.19, 'msgfmt -c'
started failing because of missing po header info. The Language:
entry was missing in some po files and some Language-Team:
entries missed the trailing \n.
The newer Gettext 0.19.1 behaves a bit more tolerant and returns
only
2014-06-14 8:17 GMT+02:00 scl scl.gp...@gmail.com:
a few days ago, after an update to GNU Gettext 0.19, 'msgfmt -c'
started failing because of missing po header info. The Language:
entry was missing in some po files and some Language-Team:
entries missed the trailing \n.
The newer Gettext
Hi Piotr,
first of all thank you for your feedback!
Indeed there are some errors in my patch which I overlooked.
Four eyes see more than two.
On 14.6.2014 at 2:52 PM Piotr Drąg wrote:
First, it uses an out of date checkout of the GTK+ repository.
Indeed my patch is based upon GTK 2.24.23
2014-06-14 16:15 GMT+02:00 scl scl.gp...@gmail.com:
On 14.6.2014 at 2:52 PM Piotr Drąg wrote:
First, it uses an out of date checkout of the GTK+ repository.
Indeed my patch is based upon GTK 2.24.23 which is three months old.
Sorry, it was my fault to not base my patch on HEAD. What a luck I
