Re: Damned Lies and GNOME 2.24

2008-03-22 Thread Yair Hershkovitz
Hi, I guess if you are small enough than your approach is ok. But at some point, maybe when you reach partially supported (50%), you should first take care of the stable release. Yair. On ה', 2008-03-20 at 16:57 +0100, Erdal Ronahi wrote: Hi, On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Yair

Re: Damned Lies and GNOME 2.24

2008-03-20 Thread Erdal Ronahi
Hi, On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Yair Hershkovitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that unless a module is 100% translated you should keep translating it on the stable branch ONLY. When the times come and you want to put all your efforts on the development release you should merge all

Re: Damned Lies and GNOME 2.24

2008-03-18 Thread Praveen A
2008/3/18, Marcel Telka [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Other outcome from GNOME 2.23/2.24 listed at DL is just to see what is our progress in GNOME 2.23/2.24. Release early (add GNOME 2.23/2.24 stats early), release often (update the stats often). :-) I would also like to see development branch listed

Re: Damned Lies and GNOME 2.24

2008-03-18 Thread Yair Hershkovitz
Hi, On ג', 2008-03-18 at 19:38 +0530, Praveen A wrote: 2008/3/18, Marcel Telka [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Other outcome from GNOME 2.23/2.24 listed at DL is just to see what is our progress in GNOME 2.23/2.24. Release early (add GNOME 2.23/2.24 stats early), release often (update the stats

Damned Lies and GNOME 2.24

2008-03-17 Thread Marcel Telka
Hi all, when are we going to add GNOME 2.24 to DL? Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |

Re: Damned Lies and GNOME 2.24

2008-03-17 Thread Claude Paroz
Le lundi 17 mars 2008 à 22:09 +0100, Marcel Telka a écrit : Hi all, when are we going to add GNOME 2.24 to DL? Hi Marcel, Generally, I'm waiting for the .1 release of the stable version. I don't see much sense in tracking the development version before that. Claude

Re: Damned Lies and GNOME 2.24

2008-03-17 Thread Marcel Telka
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:14:40PM +0100, Claude Paroz wrote: Le lundi 17 mars 2008 à 22:09 +0100, Marcel Telka a écrit : Hi all, when are we going to add GNOME 2.24 to DL? Hi Marcel, Generally, I'm waiting for the .1 release of the stable version. I don't see much sense in

Re: Damned Lies and GNOME 2.24

2008-03-17 Thread Leonardo Fontenelle
Our team translated 32% of the GNOME 2.22 documenation. During the 2.22 cycle we will continue to translate it, taking care of committing to trunk too. Maybe teams with low interface translation should do that for the GUI. Leonardo Fontenelle http://leonardof.org Em Seg, 2008-03-17 às 22:38

Re: Damned Lies and GNOME 2.24

2008-03-17 Thread Claude Paroz
Le lundi 17 mars 2008 à 22:38 +0100, Marcel Telka a écrit : On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:14:40PM +0100, Claude Paroz wrote: Le lundi 17 mars 2008 à 22:09 +0100, Marcel Telka a écrit : Hi all, when are we going to add GNOME 2.24 to DL? Hi Marcel, Generally, I'm waiting for

Re: Damned Lies and GNOME 2.24

2008-03-17 Thread Marcel Telka
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:24:11PM +0100, Claude Paroz wrote: I can understand this. On the other side, updating the current branch gives you the possibility to test your translations in a real distro (Fedora 9, Ubuntu Hardy, Foresight, ...) Yes. That's true. Other outcome from GNOME