Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-03-30 Thread Matthias Clasen
Last week, I said that I'd like to get this done by the end of March, which is almost upon us now. Therefore, I'd like to ask everybody to hold off with committing to svn. While we are not quite ready to start the migration yet, it will begin sometime later today. So to avoid duplicate work, it wo

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-03-31 Thread Matthias Clasen
2009/3/31 Kristian Høgsberg : > > The glib and gtk+ repositories are up now and they are live: > >  http://git.gnome.org/cgit/glib >  http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gtk+ > [...] > Other than that I'd say we're ready to go, but I'll leave it to Matthias to > make the call. Thanks so much, Kristian!

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-03-31 Thread Matthias Clasen
I should have also mentioned that the commands you need are: git clone git://git.gnome.org/glib git clone git://git.gnome.org/gtk+ A lot more information about the git migration and git in general can be found at http://live.gnome.org/GitMigration. ___

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-03-31 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On 03/31/2009 03:05 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: Some things that we need to sort out include ChangeLog: The git way of doing things is to do small commits, with meaningful commit messages, and forego a separate ChangeLog file. Everybody who I talked to about this recommended going this way, so I

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-03-31 Thread Claude Paroz
Le mardi 31 mars 2009 à 15:05 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > 2009/3/31 Kristian Høgsberg : > > > > > The glib and gtk+ repositories are up now and they are live: > > > > http://git.gnome.org/cgit/glib > > http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gtk+ > > > > [...] > > > Other than that I'd say we're read

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-03-31 Thread David Zeuthen
Hi, On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 21:29 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: > Matthias Clasen wrote: > > - First line (the brief description) must only be one sentence and > >must not start with a capital letter. Don't use a trailing period > >either. Don't exceed 76 characters. (Btw, should probably

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-03-31 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On 03/31/2009 03:50 PM, David Zeuthen wrote: Personally I prefer non-capital and no periods; it makes the output of 'git log |git shortlog' nicer to look at (see [1] for an example) but maybe that's just me. I think capital letters would work nice here too; trailing periods would probably look we

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-03-31 Thread David Zeuthen
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 15:05 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > Commit messages: Here are some recommendations that I think meet our needs: It would be nice to have hooks to enforce this in the master repo at git.gnome.org. Thoughts? > Working with branches: > As Kristian explained to me, there are t

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-03-31 Thread David Zeuthen
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 15:58 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > On 03/31/2009 03:50 PM, David Zeuthen wrote: > > Personally I prefer non-capital and no periods; it makes the output of > > 'git log |git shortlog' nicer to look at (see [1] for an example) but > > maybe that's just me. I think capital let

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-03-31 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > On 03/31/2009 03:50 PM, David Zeuthen wrote: >> >> Personally I prefer non-capital and no periods; it makes the output of >> 'git log |git shortlog' nicer to look at (see [1] for an example) but >> maybe that's just me. I think capital lett

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-03-31 Thread David Zeuthen
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 17:03 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > > On 03/31/2009 03:50 PM, David Zeuthen wrote: > >> > >> Personally I prefer non-capital and no periods; it makes the output of > >> 'git log |git shortlog' nicer to look at (see [

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-04-02 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 12:47 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > Last week, I said that I'd like to get this done by the end of March, > which is almost upon us now. I've got a local branch with the rebased client-side-windows work. However, I am unable to push it to git.gnome.org due to the pre-commit

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-04-02 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 12:47 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > Last week, I said that I'd like to get this done by the end of March, > which is almost upon us now. > > Therefore, I'd like to ask everybody to hold off with committing to > svn. While we are not quite ready to start the migration yet,

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-04-02 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 15:05 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > 2009/3/31 Kristian Høgsberg : > > > > > The glib and gtk+ repositories are up now and they are live: > > > > http://git.gnome.org/cgit/glib > > http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gtk+ > > > > [...] > > > Other than that I'd say we're ready to

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-04-02 Thread Martin Nordholts
Matthias Clasen wrote: > - First line (the brief description) must only be one sentence and >must not start with a capital letter. Don't use a trailing period >either. Don't exceed 76 characters. Hi, Is there any particular reason for not starting with a capital letter, e.g. are there an

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-04-03 Thread Edward Hervey
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 21:29 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: > Matthias Clasen wrote: > > - First line (the brief description) must only be one sentence and > >must not start with a capital letter. Don't use a trailing period > >either. Don't exceed 76 characters. > > Hi, > > Is there any

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-04-03 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On 04/03/2009 03:04 AM, Edward Hervey wrote: FWIW, In GStreamer git repositories we use that same rule for the one-liner with a subtle variation: * We do allow capital letters (seriously, who cares? It looks nice) * Considering you want to have as much info as possible in that one-liner,

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-04-03 Thread Philipp
Kristian Høgsberg wrote: > Just an update on my plan to possibly rebase the gtk+ repo: not going to > happen. What we have now is a good compromise between keeping all > history in the most correct form and how much work we want to put into > it. Again, no data is lost, we just have a few tags

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-04-04 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Edward Hervey wrote: > On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 21:29 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: >> Matthias Clasen wrote: >> >  - First line (the brief description) must only be one sentence and >> >    must not start with a capital letter. Don't use a trailing period >> >    ei

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-04-06 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 02:28 +0200, Philipp wrote: > > > Kristian Høgsberg wrote: > > Just an update on my plan to possibly rebase the gtk+ repo: not going to > > happen. What we have now is a good compromise between keeping all > > history in the most correct form and how much work we want to pu

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-04-06 Thread Stefan Kost
Edward Hervey schrieb: > On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 21:29 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: > >> Matthias Clasen wrote: >> >>> - First line (the brief description) must only be one sentence and >>>must not start with a capital letter. Don't use a trailing period >>>either. Don't exceed 76

Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git

2009-04-13 Thread Felipe Contreras
2009/4/6 Kristian Høgsberg : > On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 02:28 +0200, Philipp wrote: >> >> >> Kristian Høgsberg wrote: >> > Just an update on my plan to possibly rebase the gtk+ repo: not going to >> > happen.  What we have now is a good compromise between keeping all >> > history in the most correct

Upgrade of gettext on git.gnome.org (was Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git)

2009-04-02 Thread Olav Vitters
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:07:30PM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > I've got a local branch with the rebased client-side-windows work. > However, I am unable to push it to git.gnome.org due to the pre-commit > hooks: > > The following translation (.po) file appears to be invalid. (When > updating

Re: Upgrade of gettext on git.gnome.org (was Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git)

2009-04-02 Thread Owen Taylor
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 22:45 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:07:30PM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > I've got a local branch with the rebased client-side-windows work. > > However, I am unable to push it to git.gnome.org due to the pre-commit > > hooks: > > > > The follo

Re: Upgrade of gettext on git.gnome.org (was Re: Moving GLib and GTK+ to git)

2009-04-06 Thread Owen Taylor
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 16:56 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 22:45 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:07:30PM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > > I've got a local branch with the rebased client-side-windows work. > > > However, I am unable to push it to git