-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reshat Sabiq (Reşat) wrote:
> Well, crh and tt are related languages (looking at ISO
> classification), or dialects, but they are not the same. They are
> mutually comprehensible, so in a sense they can be considered
> dialects, but extent of mutual co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Hm, could you please explain the differences between these two
> dialects/languages? I know some people from Crimea and when I
> asked they told me that there's no difference at all. That was
> lng time ago, though.
>
Well,
Hm, could you please explain the differences between these two
dialects/languages? I know some people from Crimea and when I asked
they told me that there's no difference at all. That was lng time
ago, though.
--
I had a very low opinion of TCL, basically because it wasn't Lisp. --RMS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Name: Reshat Sabiq (Reşat)
e-mail and bugzilla account: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Locales:
1)
English:Crimean Tatar, Crimean Turkish
Native: Qırımtatarca (Qırım-Tatarca), Qırım Türkçesi
ISO 639:crh
list:
