When I do the following:
$ cd gnome-screensaver/po
$ svn info
Path: .
URL: svn+ssh://al_sho...@svn.gnome.org/svn/gnome-screensaver/trunk/po
Repository Root: svn+ssh://al_sho...@svn.gnome.org/svn/gnome-screensaver
Repository UUID: 6cc035ca-e325-0410-8d2b-9ec74377d5dd
Revision: 1598
Node Kind: dir
I also had the same svn lock :(
William you are listed in MAINTAINERS file, do you know anything about
this?
Cheers,
El dt 10 de 02 de 2009 a les 07:47 +0200, en/na Александър Шопов va
escriure:
> When I do the following:
>
>
> $ cd gnome-screensaver/po
> $ svn info
>
> Path: .
> URL: svn+ssh
Hi Gil,
gnome-screensaver has moved to git. I've updated the jhbuild config
now. Sorry for not letting you know sooner.
Thanks,
Jon
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Gil Forcada wrote:
> I also had the same svn lock :(
>
> William you are listed in MAINTAINERS file, do you know anything about
Le mardi 10 février 2009 à 10:51 -0500, William Jon McCann a écrit :
> Hi Gil,
>
> gnome-screensaver has moved to git. I've updated the jhbuild config
> now. Sorry for not letting you know sooner.
Is it now admitted that maintainers of core GNOME modules can freely
choose their VCS? Is it a dis
Le mardi 10 février 2009, à 17:24 +0100, Claude Paroz a écrit :
> Le mardi 10 février 2009 à 10:51 -0500, William Jon McCann a écrit :
> > Hi Gil,
> >
> > gnome-screensaver has moved to git. I've updated the jhbuild config
> > now. Sorry for not letting you know sooner.
>
> Is it now admitted t
Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Is it now admitted that maintainers of core GNOME modules can freely
> > choose their VCS? Is it a discussion/decision I missed somewhere?
> >
> > Is the release-team totally aware of this move? What is the plan
> > regarding i18n?
>
> Don't know about the other release t
I wrote.
> Pretty please, this is sensible ground, this is not the place to fuck
> up things not communicating.
s/fuck/screw/
Sorry for the bad language,
Frederic
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Pretty please, this is sensible ground, this is not the place to fuck
> up things not communicating.
Clearly, Jon can do whatever he wants with gnome-screensaver. Its his
code, and he is the maintainer. If that means translators have a so
Hey,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Matthias Clasen
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Frederic Peters wrote:
>
>> Pretty please, this is sensible ground, this is not the place to fuck
>> up things not communicating.
>
> Clearly, Jon can do whatever he wants with gnome-screensaver. Its
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 20:19 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Frederic Peters wrote:
>
> > Pretty please, this is sensible ground, this is not the place to fuck
> > up things not communicating.
>
> Clearly, Jon can do whatever he wants with gnome-screensaver. Its h
> We've moved it back to svn for now. But it sounds like we'll be
> moving to git immediately following the 2.26.0 release.
Thank you very much indeed. Still I hope that official GNOME will move
en bloc to a different source control system.
Kind regards:
al_shopov
___
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Frederic Peters wrote:
>
>> Pretty please, this is sensible ground, this is not the place to fuck
>> up things not communicating.
>
> Clearly, Jon can do whatever he wants with gnome-screensaver. Its his
> code, and he is the maintainer.
Matthias,
I found it quite shocking to hear a statement like this from a member of the
release team:
2009-02-11 klockan 02:19 skrev Matthias Clasen:
> Clearly, $maintainer can do whatever he wants with $project. Its his code,
> and he is the maintainer. If that means translators have a some
> dif
Hi!
> 2009-02-11 klockan 02:19 skrev Matthias Clasen:
> > Clearly, $maintainer can do whatever he wants with $project. Its his code,
> > and he is the maintainer. If that means translators have a some
> > difficulties, and $project may be less perfectly translated than it used
> > to, thats unfor
Am Mittwoch, den 11.02.2009, 12:49 +0100 schrieb Wouter Bolsterlee:
> That said, I'd like to see these questions answered:
>
> 1. Did you speak for yourself, or did you speak on behalf of the release
>team when you were making this totally objectionable statement?
>
> 2. What do other release
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Wouter Bolsterlee
>
> 1. Did you speak for yourself, or did you speak on behalf of the release
> team when you were making this totally objectionable statement?
I always speak for myself, unless I make a release team announcement.
I haven't given up my rights to
Hey,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
> Matthias,
>
> I found it quite shocking to hear a statement like this from a member of the
> release team:
>
> 2009-02-11 klockan 02:19 skrev Matthias Clasen:
>> Clearly, $maintainer can do whatever he wants with $project. Its his c
Le mercredi 11 février 2009, à 12:49 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee a écrit :
> 2. What do other release team members think about this? Is this the new
>policy? If so, who decided this? Is this documented somewhere?
Wouter: if you read the whole thread, you can see that there are other
release team
Hi,
William Jon McCann , Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:44:49 -0500:
> I don't think there is any need to get hysterical. It seems to me
> that what Matthias says is true. I am free to do (almost) anything I
> want with my project.
You may act as a demiurge but then you can't expect translators to be m
Hi,
Matthias Clasen , Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:22:58
-0500:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Wouter Bolsterlee
> >
> > 1. Did you speak for yourself, or did you speak on behalf of the release
> > team when you were making this totally objectionable statement?
>
> I always speak for myself, unless
Il giorno mer, 11/02/2009 alle 09.44 -0500, William Jon McCann ha
scritto:
> When we move to git immediately after 2.26.0 I trust that everyone
> will be informed and ready to tackle the workflow changes that result.
> I suggest that instead of continuing this conversation we focus on
> making su
On 2/12/09, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 11/02/2009 alle 09.44 -0500, William Jon McCann ha
> scritto:
> > When we move to git immediately after 2.26.0 I trust that everyone
> > will be informed and ready to tackle the workflow changes that result.
> > I suggest that instead of conti
El jue, 12-02-2009 a las 12:30 +0100, Luca Ferretti escribió:
> [1] but little shocked for recent "I'm myself and I don't care about
> GNOME community rules" events :(
I think the most important thing to learn from these "events" is that
when you delay a community-based decision so long, people st
23 matches
Mail list logo
