Request freeze break for: "fail whale extensions list looks bad"

2012-03-21 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671693 We're replacing the code that switches extensions on/off in the fail whale with something that disables all extensions - it was never a good UI in the first place. --   Jasper ___ gnome-i18n mailing lis

Re: Request freeze break for: "fail whale extensions list looks bad"

2012-03-21 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 07:21 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671693 > > We're replacing the code that switches extensions on/off in the fail > whale with something that disables all extensions - it was never a > good UI in the first place. To make this

Re: Request freeze break for: "fail whale extensions list looks bad"

2012-03-21 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
Nothing too impressive. Just looks like: http://i.imgur.com/8SxPW.png (only with the new string and without the window decoration) On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 07:21 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6716

Re: Request freeze break for: "fail whale extensions list looks bad"

2012-03-21 Thread Colin Walters
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 07:51 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > Nothing too impressive. Just looks like: http://i.imgur.com/8SxPW.png > (only with the new string and without the window decoration) That looks like the old ui? Anyways, patch looks OK, and clearly the old UI was insane, so: r-t appro

Re: Request freeze break for: "fail whale extensions list looks bad"

2012-03-21 Thread Shaun McCance
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 09:24 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 07:51 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > > Nothing too impressive. Just looks like: http://i.imgur.com/8SxPW.png > > (only with the new string and without the window decoration) > > That looks like the old ui? Anyways,

Re: Request freeze break for: "fail whale extensions list looks bad"

2012-03-21 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
Here's a faked screenshot with the current string: http://i.imgur.com/n18Ka.png On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 09:24 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: >> On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 07:51 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: >> > Nothing too impressive. Just looks l

Re: Request freeze break for: "fail whale extensions list looks bad"

2012-03-21 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 11:26 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > Here's a faked screenshot with the current string: > http://i.imgur.com/n18Ka.png This comment is not specific to the requested UI change: If you "have disabled all extensions as a precaution" for me, why is the only available option t

Re: Request freeze break for: "fail whale extensions list looks bad"

2012-03-21 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 11:26 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: >> Here's a faked screenshot with the current string: >> http://i.imgur.com/n18Ka.png > > This comment is not specific to the requested UI change: > If you "have disabled all exten

Re: Request freeze break for: "fail whale extensions list looks bad"

2012-03-22 Thread Abderrahim Kitouni
في ر، 21-03-2012 عند 11:49 -0400 ، كتب Jasper St. Pierre: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Andre Klapper wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 11:26 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > >> Here's a faked screenshot with the current string: > >> http://i.imgur.com/n18Ka.png > > > > This comment is not

Re: Request freeze break for: "fail whale extensions list looks bad"

2012-03-22 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Abderrahim Kitouni wrote: > > I'm not sure this is the best place to discuss this, should I open a bug > about this? > > Still I agree with Andre: logging the user out is the best way for them > to lose their work. If gnome-shell crashes, which is AFAICT the most

Re: Request freeze break for: "fail whale extensions list looks bad"

2012-03-22 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671693 > > We're replacing the code that switches extensions on/off in the fail > whale with something that disables all extensions - it was never a > good UI in the first place. Did this get en

Re: Request freeze break for: "fail whale extensions list looks bad"

2012-03-22 Thread Andre Klapper
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 18:07 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Jasper St. Pierre > wrote: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671693 > > > > We're replacing the code that switches extensions on/off in the fail > > whale with something that disables all exte

Re: Request freeze break for: "fail whale extensions list looks bad"

2012-03-22 Thread Gil Forcada
El dj 22 de 03 de 2012 a les 23:40 +0100, en/na Andre Klapper va escriure: > On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 18:07 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Jasper St. Pierre > > wrote: > > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671693 > > > > > > We're replacing the code that

Re: Request freeze break for: "fail whale extensions list looks bad"

2012-03-23 Thread Gabor Kelemen
2012-03-23 00:05 keltezéssel, Gil Forcada írta: El dj 22 de 03 de 2012 a les 23:40 +0100, en/na Andre Klapper va escriure: On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 18:07 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671693 We