Sound-juicer: is it the part of official release

2012-03-27 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Hi all, in GNOME 3.4 release-notes, some improvements in sound-juicer are mentioned [1]. Though this module is not listed as part of official 3.4 release set [2]. Doesn't it indicate that it should be moved to official release set, adding string freeze/release date requirements for this module?

Re: Sound-juicer: is it the part of official release

2012-03-27 Thread Olav Vitters
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:23:43PM +0300, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > in GNOME 3.4 release-notes, some improvements in sound-juicer are > mentioned [1]. Though this module is not listed as part of official 3.4 > release set [2]. > > Doesn't it indicate that it should be moved to official release set,

Re: Sound-juicer: is it the part of official release

2012-03-27 Thread Andre Klapper
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 15:23 +0300, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > in GNOME 3.4 release-notes, some improvements in sound-juicer are > mentioned [1]. Not really. I mention sound-juicer *once* in the development section: "Several packages (such as gnome-bluetooth, gnome-control-center, gnome-settings-daem

Re: Sound-juicer: is it the part of official release

2012-03-27 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
On 03/27/2012 03:28 PM, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 15:23 +0300, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >> in GNOME 3.4 release-notes, some improvements in sound-juicer are >> mentioned [1]. > > Not really. I mention sound-juicer *once* in the development section: > "Several packages (such as gno

Re: Sound-juicer: is it the part of official release

2012-03-27 Thread Andre Klapper
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 15:30 +0300, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > No, it's mentioned in another section too, in "Many Application > Enhancements" section. "The Sound Juicer CD ripper has a new metadata > fetching facility which provides enhanced support for multi-disc albums." Ah thanks for clarifying,