Hi all,
I would like to ask for string freeze break approval for
gnome-control-center 42.1.
There was a typo in one of the strings used in the dropdown menu under
`Privacy->Screen Lock->Automatic Screen Lock Delay` causing the
5 minutes setting to wrongly be displayed as "3 minutes". In addition
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 7:52 AM Sebastian Keller via gnome-i18n
wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi,
> I would like to ask for string freeze break approval for
> gnome-control-center 42.1.
>
> There was a typo in one of the strings used in the dropdown menu under
> `Privacy->Screen Lock->Automatic Screen Lock De
2/2 from i18n
Thanks!
El jue, 7 abr 2022 a las 11:58, Alexandre Franke ()
escribió:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 7:52 AM Sebastian Keller via gnome-i18n
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> Hi,
>
> > I would like to ask for string freeze break approval for
> > gnome-control-center 42.1.
> >
> > There was a typ
Le 07.04.22 à 11:57, Alexandre Franke a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 7:52 AM Sebastian Keller via gnome-i18n
wrote:
Hi all,
Hi,
I would like to ask for string freeze break approval for
gnome-control-center 42.1.
There was a typo in one of the strings used in the dropdown menu under
`Pri
Le 07.04.22 à 13:43, Claude Paroz a écrit :
Easy fix for translators and two weeks before the release should be
plenty of time for it. Here’s approval 1/2 from i18n.
2/2 from i18n.
Claude
Sorry Daniel I missed your mail, then 3/2 :-)
___
gnom
Never mind! ;-)
El jue, 7 abr 2022 a las 13:44, Claude Paroz ()
escribió:
> Le 07.04.22 à 13:43, Claude Paroz a écrit :
> >> Easy fix for translators and two weeks before the release should be
> >> plenty of time for it. Here’s approval 1/2 from i18n.
> >
> > 2/2 from i18n.
> >
> > Claude
>
> Sor
Thanks everyone!
The change has now been merged.
Also I think it is quite fitting that the number 3 somehow managed to
sneak into the number of approvals here as well :)
Cheers,
Sebastian
On Thu, 2022-04-07 at 13:44 +0200, Claude Paroz wrote:
> Le 07.04.22 à 13:43, Claude Paroz a écrit :
> > >
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 1:59 PM Sebastian Keller via gnome-i18n
wrote:
> Also I think it is quite fitting that the number 3 somehow managed to
> sneak into the number of approvals here as well :)
What do you mean? We’d still need two more to reach 3. ;-P
--
Alexandre Franke
GNOME Hacker