Wacom ui freeze break request

2011-09-02 Thread Bastien Nocera
Hey, Peter and Jimmac did some work on the Wacom panel, and fixed some of the niggles that were there. The two patches are in: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657810 and: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657425 Let me know if you have questions.

Epiphany UI freeze break request

2011-09-02 Thread Claudio Saavedra
Hei, There are a few rough edges in the new web application support related to overwriting and possible woes when saving new apps. There are a few patches in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658060 aiming to address this, but they add a dialog and a notification, plus a few new strings.

Nautilus UI freeze break request

2012-08-28 Thread Cosimo Cecchi
Hi, We have a patchset in Nautilus that redesigns the "Connect to Server" dialog. Notable changes are: - the dialog now remembers and keeps track of the servers you connected to in the past (allowing you to remove or clear the list on context menu) - instead of having the dialog construct the URI

Epiphany UI freeze break request

2012-08-30 Thread Claudio Saavedra
Hei, We've been working in a replacement for the default page in Ephy that shows a grid with the most visited pages. Unfortunately we weren't ready in time to land this before the UI freeze, but we think we can do it now, before 3.5.91. The wip is in the 'in-tab-overview' branch, but we would lik

Re: UI freeze break request

2012-09-12 Thread Cosimo Cecchi
Hi all, On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Andre Klapper wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 20:27 -0400, Michael Hill wrote: >> 3.6 user docs should accomodate Help app menu entries for Contacts[1] >> and Documents[2]. >> [2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683835 > > Yes they shoul

Re: UI freeze break request

2012-09-12 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: > Hi all, > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Andre Klapper wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 20:27 -0400, Michael Hill wrote: >>> 3.6 user docs should accomodate Help app menu entries for Contacts[1] >>> and Documents[2]. > >>> [2] h

Re: UI freeze break request

2012-09-12 Thread Cosimo Cecchi
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Andre Klapper wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 20:27 -0400, Michael Hill wrote: 3.6 user docs should accomodate Help

Re: UI freeze break request

2012-09-13 Thread Gabor Kelemen
2012-09-12 21:05 keltezéssel, Cosimo Cecchi írta: Hi all, On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Andre Klapper wrote: Hi, On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 20:27 -0400, Michael Hill wrote: 3.6 user docs should accomodate Help app menu entries for Contacts[1] and Documents[2]. [2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org

Re: UI freeze break request

2012-09-13 Thread Gil Forcada Codinachs
2/2 i18n approval. Cherrs, On Sep 13, 2012 11:44 AM, "Gabor Kelemen" wrote: > 2012-09-12 21:05 keltezéssel, Cosimo Cecchi írta: > >> Hi all, >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Andre Klapper wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 20:27 -0400, Michael Hill wrote: >>> 3.6 user do

Boxes UI freeze break request

2013-03-05 Thread Michael Hill
Hi all, I'm requesting a freeze break for the Help app menu item for Boxes[1]. Thanks! Mike [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695212 ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

Accerciser UI freeze break request

2013-03-05 Thread Javier Hernández Antúnez
Hi! I know that we're on .92, but I'd like to push the HighContrast icon for Accerciser. You can find attached the svg file and a patch on this bug report [1] Thanks in advance, Javi [1]: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695141 -- Javier Hernández Antúnez __

Boxes: UI freeze break request

2015-02-22 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Hi, I wanted to ask for a UI freeze break for the following bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738517 The only change that I'd call an actual UI break is addition of string "No snapshots created yet. Create one using the button below." to the snapshots view when no snapshots are ava

Power settings ui freeze break request

2011-09-01 Thread Allan Day
Hi all, The current power panel settings have a few usability issues that it would be great to have fixed for 3.2. I have recently been working on a new design for these that could be implemented in the next couple of days (ie. before the string freeze). The relevant bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.o

Re: Wacom ui freeze break request

2011-09-02 Thread Javier Jardón
On 2 September 2011 14:58, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Hey, Hello > Peter and Jimmac did some work on the Wacom panel, and fixed some of the > niggles that were there. > > The two patches are in: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657810 +1 > and: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cg

Re: Wacom ui freeze break request

2011-09-02 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > The two patches are in: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657810 > and: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657425 > > Let me know if you have questions. Since this is a brandnew panel, I think we should let these change

Re: Epiphany UI freeze break request

2011-09-02 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Claudio Saavedra wrote: > Hei, > > There are a few rough edges in the new web application support related > to overwriting and possible woes when saving new apps. There are a few > patches in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658060 aiming to > address thi

Re: Epiphany UI freeze break request

2011-09-02 Thread Frederic Peters
Claudio Saavedra wrote: > There are a few rough edges in the new web application support related > to overwriting and possible woes when saving new apps. There are a few > patches in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658060 aiming to > address this, but they add a dialog and a notificatio

Re: Wacom ui freeze break request

2011-09-02 Thread Frederic Peters
Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > The two patches are in: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657810 Ok, pending i18n and doc approvals. > > and: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657425 Has been commited already. **Pl

Re: Wacom ui freeze break request

2011-09-02 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:34 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: > Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > > The two patches are in: > > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657810 > > Ok, pending i18n and doc approvals. > > > > > and: > > > ht

Re: Epiphany UI freeze break request

2011-09-02 Thread Claude Paroz
Le vendredi 02 septembre 2011 à 17:31 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit : > Claudio Saavedra wrote: > > > There are a few rough edges in the new web application support related > > to overwriting and possible woes when saving new apps. There are a few > > patches in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bu

Re: Wacom ui freeze break request

2011-09-03 Thread Shaun McCance
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 16:39 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:34 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: > > Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > > > > The two patches are in: > > > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6578

Re: Epiphany UI freeze break request

2011-09-03 Thread Shaun McCance
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:31 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: > Claudio Saavedra wrote: > > > There are a few rough edges in the new web application support related > > to overwriting and possible woes when saving new apps. There are a few > > patches in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6580

Re: Wacom ui freeze break request

2011-09-06 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 10:22 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 16:39 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:34 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: > > > Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Bastien Nocera > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Th

Re: Wacom ui freeze break request

2011-09-06 Thread Claude Paroz
Le mardi 06 septembre 2011 à 21:36 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit : > On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 10:22 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 16:39 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:34 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: > > > > Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > > > On Fri,

Re: Nautilus UI freeze break request

2012-08-28 Thread Shaun McCance
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 14:54 -0400, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: > Hi, > > We have a patchset in Nautilus that redesigns the "Connect to Server" dialog. > Notable changes are: > - the dialog now remembers and keeps track of the servers you > connected to in the past (allowing you to remove or clear the lis

Re: Nautilus UI freeze break request

2012-08-28 Thread Cosimo Cecchi
Hi Shaun, On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: > Docs team: This means somebody need to completely rewrite > nautilus-connect.page to: > 1) Describe how to write the URIs in general. > 2) List the available URI schemes and what they're for. > 3) Describe how to put details like

Re: Nautilus UI freeze break request

2012-08-28 Thread Shaun McCance
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 16:32 -0400, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: > Hi Shaun, > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: > > > Docs team: This means somebody need to completely rewrite > > nautilus-connect.page to: > > 1) Describe how to write the URIs in general. > > 2) List the available

Re: Nautilus UI freeze break request

2012-08-28 Thread Cosimo Cecchi
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: > If you get directions from a hosting service to upload files > with FTP/SFTP/SCP/etc, they're usually for a dedicated client > or using the command line. In either case, they don't usually > give a complete URL. > > I use this feature to con

Re: Nautilus UI freeze break request

2012-08-28 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: > > Writing made-up URLs by hand seems like a trip back to 2001 > to me. It does mean there's more to document. Who wants to > do it? > I must say I found the argument in bug 682637 pretty convincing, that the new dialog is much more similar

Re: Epiphany UI freeze break request

2012-08-30 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Claudio Saavedra wrote: > Hei, > > We've been working in a replacement for the default page in Ephy that > shows a grid with the most visited pages. Unfortunately we weren't ready > in time to land this before the UI freeze, but we think we can do it > now, before

Re: Epiphany UI freeze break request

2012-08-30 Thread Frederic Peters
Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Claudio Saavedra > wrote: > > Hei, > > > > We've been working in a replacement for the default page in Ephy that > > shows a grid with the most visited pages. Unfortunately we weren't ready > > in time to land this before the UI freeze, b

Re: Epiphany UI freeze break request

2012-08-30 Thread Pierre-Yves Luyten
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:50:38 +0300, Claudio Saavedra wrote: > Hei, > > We've been working in a replacement for the default page in Ephy > > (...) > > We don't have docs at the time so I believe this shouldn't be a problem > for the documentation team. > There's a bug to follow Ephy documentati

Re: Nautilus UI freeze break request

2012-08-30 Thread Matthias Clasen
I've attached a quick (untested) patch that shows minimal changes that are imo sufficient to update the nautilus-connect.page to the new dialog. Shaun, does this look good enough ? 0001-Update-for-Connect-to-Server-changes.patch Description: Binary data __

Re: Nautilus UI freeze break request

2012-08-31 Thread Piñeiro
On 08/30/2012 11:39 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > I've attached a quick (untested) patch that shows minimal changes that > are imo sufficient to update the nautilus-connect.page to the new > dialog. > > Shaun, does this look good enough ? FWIW, +1 from me as far as gnome-docs (so Shaun) agrees. BR

Re: Nautilus UI freeze break request

2012-08-31 Thread Andre Klapper
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 17:30 +0200, Piñeiro wrote: > On 08/30/2012 11:39 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > I've attached a quick (untested) patch that shows minimal changes that > > are imo sufficient to update the nautilus-connect.page to the new > > dialog. > > > > Shaun, does this look good enough ?

Re: Nautilus UI freeze break request

2012-08-31 Thread Radina Matic
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Andre Klapper wrote: > [General comment: User documentation could also benefit from adding how > to add a Samba share?] > +1 for this I remember having had to struggle with this myself earlier this year. Cheers, R. __

Re: Nautilus UI freeze break request

2012-09-01 Thread Shaun McCance
On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 17:39 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > I've attached a quick (untested) patch that shows minimal changes that > are imo sufficient to update the nautilus-connect.page to the new > dialog. > > Shaun, does this look good enough ? Needs work. I'll do a full review on gnome-doc-l

Re: Nautilus UI freeze break request

2012-09-03 Thread Cosimo Cecchi
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 17:39 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> I've attached a quick (untested) patch that shows minimal changes that >> are imo sufficient to update the nautilus-connect.page to the new >> dialog. >> >> Shaun, does this look goo

Re: Boxes UI freeze break request

2013-03-05 Thread Andre Klapper
Hi Mike, On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 08:46 -0500, Michael Hill wrote: > I'm requesting a freeze break for the Help app menu item for Boxes[1]. > [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695212 That report is not clear to me at all. Does "Help" in the app menu already exist and just needs to be l

Re: Boxes UI freeze break request

2013-03-05 Thread Michael Hill
Hi André On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Andre Klapper wrote: > That report is not clear to me at all. > Does "Help" in the app menu already exist and just needs to be linked > against help:gnome-boxes ? If so, no new string would be introduced, and > no UI change takes place either. Sorry, hel

Re: Boxes UI freeze break request

2013-03-05 Thread Michael Hill
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Michael Hill wrote: > Sorry, help was just merged and the app menu needs a 'Help' entry to > access it. Patch is pending. Patch submitted and reviewed. Mike ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.

Re: Boxes UI freeze break request

2013-03-05 Thread Andre Klapper
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 10:13 -0500, Michael Hill wrote: > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Michael Hill wrote: > > > Sorry, help was just merged and the app menu needs a 'Help' entry to > > access it. Patch is pending. > > Patch submitted and reviewed. So we talk about one string addition, "Help"

Re: Boxes UI freeze break request

2013-03-05 Thread Javier Jardón
On 5 March 2013 16:33, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 10:13 -0500, Michael Hill wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Michael Hill wrote: >> >> > Sorry, help was just merged and the app menu needs a 'Help' entry to >> > access it. Patch is pending. >> >> Patch submitted and revi

Re: Boxes UI freeze break request

2013-03-05 Thread Olav Vitters
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:33:09PM +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 10:13 -0500, Michael Hill wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Michael Hill wrote: > > > > > Sorry, help was just merged and the app menu needs a 'Help' entry to > > > access it. Patch is pending. > > >

Re: Accerciser UI freeze break request

2013-03-05 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Javier Hernández Antúnez wrote: > Hi! > > I know that we're on .92, but I'd like to push the HighContrast icon > for Accerciser. > You can find attached the svg file and a patch on this bug report [1] > > > Thanks in advance, > Javi > > > [1]: https://bugzilla.gnome

Re: Accerciser UI freeze break request

2013-03-05 Thread Andre Klapper
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 17:28 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Javier Hernández Antúnez > wrote: > > I know that we're on .92, but I'd like to push the HighContrast icon > > for Accerciser. > > You can find attached the svg file and a patch on this bug report [1] > > [

Re: Boxes: UI freeze break request

2015-02-22 Thread Alexandre Franke
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to ask for a UI freeze break for the following bug: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738517 > > The only change that I'd call an actual UI break is addition of string > "No snapshots created yet. Create

Re: Boxes: UI freeze break request

2015-02-23 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to ask for a UI freeze break for the following bug: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738517 > > The only change that I'd call an actual UI break is addition of string > "No snapshots created yet. Create

Re: Boxes: UI freeze break request

2015-02-23 Thread Frederic Peters
Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I wanted to ask for a UI freeze break for the following bug: > > > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738517 > > > > The only change that I'd call an actual UI break is addition of s

Re: Power settings ui freeze break request

2011-09-01 Thread Shaun McCance
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:12 +0100, Allan Day wrote: > Hi all, > > The current power panel settings have a few usability issues that it > would be great to have fixed for 3.2. I have recently been working on > a new design for these that could be implemented in the next couple of > days (ie. before

Re: Power settings ui freeze break request

2011-09-01 Thread Allan Day
Hey Shaun, On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:12 +0100, Allan Day wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The current power panel settings have a few usability issues that it >> would be great to have fixed for 3.2. I have recently been working on >> a new design for

Re: Power settings ui freeze break request

2011-09-01 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 09:01 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:12 +0100, Allan Day wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The current power panel settings have a few usability issues that it > > would be great to have fixed for 3.2. I have recently been working on > > a new design for thes

Re: Power settings ui freeze break request

2011-09-01 Thread Allan Day
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:12 +0100, Allan Day wrote: ... >> The new design has been reviewed by several members of the design >> team. I've checked the user documentation and, from what I can tell, >> these changes will not have much impact the

Re: Power settings ui freeze break request

2011-09-01 Thread Shaun McCance
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 15:41 +0100, Allan Day wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:12 +0100, Allan Day wrote: > ... > >> The new design has been reviewed by several members of the design > >> team. I've checked the user documentation and, from w

Re: Power settings ui freeze break request

2011-09-02 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 15:41 +0100, Allan Day wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: >> > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:12 +0100, Allan Day wrote: >> ... >> >> The new design has been reviewed by several members of the desi

Re: Power settings ui freeze break request

2011-09-02 Thread Javier Jardón
On 2 September 2011 17:47, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> >> No objections for the docs, provided the end result matches >> these mockups (give or take some pixels). If it's different, >> please provide screenshots. >> > > In that case, +1 of 2 for the release team +1 from me also -- Javier Jardón

Re: Power settings ui freeze break request

2011-09-02 Thread Frederic Peters
Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Shaun McCance wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 15:41 +0100, Allan Day wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: > >> > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:12 +0100, Allan Day wrote: > >> ... > >> >> The new design has been rev

Re: Power settings ui freeze break request

2011-09-02 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 18:51 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: > Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Shaun McCance wrote: > > > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 15:41 +0100, Allan Day wrote: > > >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: > > >> > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:1

Re: Power settings ui freeze break request

2011-09-06 Thread Allan Day
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 18:51 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: >> Matthias Clasen wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Shaun McCance wrote: >> > > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 15:41 +0100, Allan Day wrote: >> > >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:01

GNOME Control Center: UI freeze break request

2013-02-25 Thread Debarshi Ray
I would like to commit this patch to the Online Accounts panel in GNOME Control Center: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=689645 This is a UI change because it affects the way we tell the user that her credentials are not valid anymore. Here is a screenshot with the patch in place: https:

GNOME Control Center: UI freeze break request

2013-03-04 Thread Debarshi Ray
I would like to commit this patch to the Online Accounts panel in GNOME Control Center for 3.7.91: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688056 Screenshots are available on the bug. The following new strings were added: "Mail" "Contacts" "Resources" "Other" I have been using this patch loca

g-c-c: UI freeze break request

2013-03-15 Thread Rui Tiago Cação Matos
Hi, I'd like to push some patches that break the UI freeze. They are meant to make the implementation closer to the designs and address a usability concern (the "..." label). Here are the bugs: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695465 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694927 htt

Re: GNOME Control Center: UI freeze break request

2013-02-25 Thread Shaun McCance
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 16:29 +, Debarshi Ray wrote: > I would like to commit this patch to the Online Accounts panel in GNOME > Control Center: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=689645 > > This is a UI change because it affects the way we tell the user that her > credentials are not va

Re: GNOME Control Center: UI freeze break request

2013-02-25 Thread Debarshi Ray
>> The following new strings were added: >> "Credentials have expired." >> "Sign In to enable this account." > > Should be "Sign in to enable this account." There's no reason to > capitalize "in". Corrected. It was capitalized in the mock-up, but I think it was just an oversight. Thanks, Debars

Re: GNOME Control Center: UI freeze break request

2013-02-27 Thread Frederic Peters
Debarshi Ray wrote: > I would like to commit this patch to the Online Accounts panel in GNOME > Control Center: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=689645 > > This is a UI change because it affects the way we tell the user that her > credentials are not valid anymore. Here is a screenshot

Re: GNOME Control Center: UI freeze break request

2013-02-27 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 16:28 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: > Debarshi Ray wrote: > > > I would like to commit this patch to the Online Accounts panel in GNOME > > Control Center: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=689645 > > > > This is a UI change because it affects the way we tell the us

Re: GNOME Control Center: UI freeze break request

2013-02-27 Thread Debarshi Ray
> Another +1 from r-t if docs team is fine. I already made the change suggested by Shaun, so I hope it is ok. If no one objects I will commit it tomorrow. Thanks, Debarshi -- If computers are going to revolutionize education, then steam engines and cars and electricity would have done it too.

Re: GNOME Control Center: UI freeze break request

2013-02-27 Thread Shaun McCance
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 17:05 +, Debarshi Ray wrote: > > Another +1 from r-t if docs team is fine. > > I already made the change suggested by Shaun, so I hope it is ok. If no one > objects I will commit it tomorrow. I was just giving a nitpick on language. I don't know the docs impact. I suspec

Re: GNOME Control Center: UI freeze break request

2013-02-28 Thread Michael Hill
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 17:05 +, Debarshi Ray wrote: >> > Another +1 from r-t if docs team is fine. >> >> I already made the change suggested by Shaun, so I hope it is ok. If no one >> objects I will commit it tomorrow. > > I was just givi

Re: GNOME Control Center: UI freeze break request

2013-02-28 Thread Debarshi Ray
Committed and pushed. Thanks! Cheers, Debarshi -- If computers are going to revolutionize education, then steam engines and cars and electricity would have done it too. -- Arjun Shankar pgp6R_ZCOegSk.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ gnome-i18n mai

Re: GNOME Control Center: UI freeze break request

2013-03-04 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Debarshi Ray wrote: > I would like to commit this patch to the Online Accounts panel in GNOME > Control Center for 3.7.91: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688056 > > Screenshots are available on the bug. > > The following new strings were added: > "Mail"

Re: GNOME Control Center: UI freeze break request

2013-03-04 Thread Michael Hill
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Debarshi Ray wrote: >> I would like to commit this patch to the Online Accounts panel in GNOME >> Control Center for 3.7.91: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688056 >> >> Screenshots are available

Re: GNOME Control Center: UI freeze break request

2013-03-05 Thread Andre Klapper
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 19:18 -0500, Michael Hill wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Matthias Clasen > wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Debarshi Ray wrote: > >> I would like to commit this patch to the Online Accounts panel in GNOME > >> Control Center for 3.7.91: > >> https://bug

Re: GNOME Control Center: UI freeze break request

2013-03-05 Thread Debarshi Ray
Pushed and committed. Thanks, Debarshi -- If computers are going to revolutionize education, then steam engines and cars and electricity would have done it too. -- Arjun Shankar pgpFqBTf2mQbW.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ gnome-i18n mailing lis

Re: g-c-c: UI freeze break request

2013-03-16 Thread Frederic Peters
Rui Tiago Cação Matos wrote: > I'd like to push some patches that break the UI freeze. They are meant > to make the implementation closer to the designs and address a > usability concern (the "..." label). Here are the bugs: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695465 > https://bugzilla

Re: g-c-c: UI freeze break request

2013-03-17 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Frederic Peters wrote: > Rui Tiago Cação Matos wrote: > >> I'd like to push some patches that break the UI freeze. They are meant >> to make the implementation closer to the designs and address a >> usability concern (the "..." label). Here are the bugs: >> >> http

UI freeze break request: incoming muc invitation in Empathy

2009-02-10 Thread Guillaume Desmottes
Hi guys, We'd like to merge a branch [1] implementing incoming multi users chat invitation support in Empathy [2]. This branch adds a blinking icon in the notification area when user receives a muc invitation and a small dialog asking if he wants to accept or deny the invitation. Only 4 simples

String/UI freeze break request to fix BGO# 401546

2007-02-25 Thread Veerapuram Varadhan
Hi, As part of 2.9.x development, we added support for choosing various "Send Options" provided by both Novell Groupwise and Microsoft Exchange. While committing the feature, the fix attached to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401546 didn't make it in, which is duly found and reporte

g-c-c UI freeze break request - bug 743400

2015-02-26 Thread Rui Tiago Cação Matos
Hi, I'd like to push the patches in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743400 . There's a screenshot with changes there. Those patches also add new translatable strings for a11y purposes. Thanks, Rui ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome

Fwd: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

2019-09-03 Thread Georges Basile Stavracas Neto via gnome-i18n
CCing the i18n team. -- Mensagem encaminhada -- De: Georges Basile Stavracas Neto Assunto: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell Data: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:05:44 -0300 Para: release-t...@gnome.org To the Release Team, I hereby ask for String and UI freeze b

Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

2019-09-03 Thread Alexandre Franke
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:08 PM Georges Basile Stavracas Neto via gnome-i18n wrote: > I hereby ask for String and UI freeze break exceptions for landing GNOME > Shell's > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/675. This merge > request is an important last step for feature-compl

Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

2019-09-03 Thread Georges Basile Stavracas Neto via gnome-i18n
The new string is a verb, "Rename". It is displayed at the rename folder popover, introduced by that merge request. Since it's a critical part of the merge request, not approving this break would prevent that merge request from being merged. Em ter, 3 de set de 2019 às 16:54, Alexandre Franke esc

Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

2019-09-03 Thread Alexandre Franke
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:16 PM Georges Basile Stavracas Neto wrote: > not approving this break would prevent that merge request from being merged. Right. That’s not a very useful answer though. My question was what the current behaviour is, i.e what will the user see if this doesn’t get merged.

Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

2019-09-03 Thread Georges Basile Stavracas Neto via gnome-i18n
You should read it again, then. The rename popover, that is introduced by that merge request, will not be introduced if the merge request isn't merged. Without the rename folder popover, users won't be able to rename folders from GNOME Shell. Em ter, 3 de set de 2019 às 17:22, Alexandre Franke es

Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

2019-09-03 Thread Alexandre Franke
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:28 PM Georges Basile Stavracas Neto wrote: > You should read it again, then. I really shouldn’t. That is my point actually. A freeze request should clearly explain from the start what the benefits and risks are, so that we coordinators can make a well-informed decision.

Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

2019-09-03 Thread Georges Basile Stavracas Neto via gnome-i18n
Users can use dconf-editor to rename folders, but that would make for a terrible user experience. Renaming folders is critical to managing app folders from GNOME Shell. Em ter, 3 de set de 2019 às 17:41, Alexandre Franke escreveu: > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:28 PM Georges Basile Stavracas Neto >

Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

2019-09-03 Thread Alexandre Franke
1/2 for a merge right **after** 3.34 for a 3.34.1 inclusion. -- Alexandre Franke GNOME Hacker ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

2019-09-03 Thread Arnaud Bonatti via gnome-i18n
Hey, a “small detail”: 2019-09-03 22:44 UTC+02:00, Georges Basile Stavracas Neto via gnome-i18n : > Users can use dconf-editor to rename folders, but that would make for > a terrible user experience. They cannot, there is no way to do that. Well, in fact, they can set all the things manually if t

Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

2019-09-03 Thread Alexandre Franke
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:55 PM Arnaud Bonatti wrote: > They cannot, there is no way to do that. Well, in fact, they can set > all the things manually if they know dconf-editor as I know it, as its > maintainer and main developer; but the *creation* of a folder would > look impossible to most user

Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

2019-09-04 Thread Daniel Mustieles García via gnome-i18n
This request has 2/2 from release-team, and it's just one string (with one word). I agree with Alexandre, but having RT approval there is no need to stop this from i18n, so 1/2. Regards El mié., 4 sept. 2019 a las 7:28, Alexandre Franke () escribió: > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:55 PM Arnaud Bona

Re: UI freeze break request: incoming muc invitation in Empathy

2009-02-10 Thread Frederic Peters
[adding gnome-doc-list in CC'] Guillaume Desmottes wrote: > We'd like to merge a branch [1] implementing incoming multi users chat > invitation support in Empathy [2]. > > This branch adds a blinking icon in the notification area when user > receives a muc invitation and a small dialog asking i

Re: UI freeze break request: incoming muc invitation in Empathy

2009-02-10 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Dienstag, den 10.02.2009, 17:45 +0100 schrieb Frederic Peters: > Guillaume Desmottes wrote: > > We'd like to merge a branch [1] implementing incoming multi users chat > > invitation support in Empathy [2]. > > > > This branch adds a blinking icon in the notification area when user > > receives

Re: UI freeze break request: incoming muc invitation in Empathy

2009-02-11 Thread Milo Casagrande
Il giorno mar, 10/02/2009 alle 17.45 +0100, Frederic Peters ha scritto: > The UI change is minimal, and from a quick look at the documentation > it doesn't seem the actions that can be performed from the status icon > are mentioned at all. I've been asked to add a little comment into this thread s

Re: UI freeze break request: incoming muc invitation in Empathy

2009-02-12 Thread Guillaume Desmottes
Le mercredi 11 février 2009 à 18:40 +0100, Milo Casagrande a écrit : > Il giorno mar, 10/02/2009 alle 17.45 +0100, Frederic Peters ha scritto: > > The UI change is minimal, and from a quick look at the documentation > > it doesn't seem the actions that can be performed from the status icon > > are

Re: UI freeze break request: incoming muc invitation in Empathy

2009-02-12 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 12 février 2009, à 15:34 +, Guillaume Desmottes a écrit : > Le mercredi 11 février 2009 à 18:40 +0100, Milo Casagrande a écrit : > > Il giorno mar, 10/02/2009 alle 17.45 +0100, Frederic Peters ha scritto: > > > The UI change is minimal, and from a quick look at the documentation > > >

Re: UI freeze break request: incoming muc invitation in Empathy

2009-02-12 Thread Shaun McCance
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 16:39 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > Le jeudi 12 février 2009, à 15:34 +, Guillaume Desmottes a écrit : > > Le mercredi 11 février 2009 à 18:40 +0100, Milo Casagrande a écrit : > > > Il giorno mar, 10/02/2009 alle 17.45 +0100, Frederic Peters ha scritto: > > > > The UI chang

Re: UI freeze break request: incoming muc invitation in Empathy

2009-02-13 Thread Guillaume Desmottes
Le jeudi 12 février 2009 à 10:15 -0600, Shaun McCance a écrit : > On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 16:39 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > > Le jeudi 12 février 2009, à 15:34 +, Guillaume Desmottes a écrit : > > > Le mercredi 11 février 2009 à 18:40 +0100, Milo Casagrande a écrit : > > > > Il giorno mar, 10/02

Re: String/UI freeze break request to fix BGO# 401546

2007-02-26 Thread Kjartan Maraas
fre, 23.02.2007 kl. 07.40 -0700, skrev Veerapuram Varadhan: > Hi, > > As part of 2.9.x development, we added support for choosing various > "Send Options" provided by both Novell Groupwise and Microsoft > Exchange. > > While committing the feature, the fix attached to > http://bugzilla.gnome.o

Re: String/UI freeze break request to fix BGO# 401546

2007-02-26 Thread Andre Klapper
ahoj, Am Freitag, den 23.02.2007, 07:40 -0700 schrieb Veerapuram Varadhan: > While committing the feature, the fix attached to > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401546 didn't make it in, > which is duly found and reported by Andre Klapper. As, the attached > fix > adds a new string and

Re: String/UI freeze break request to fix BGO# 401546

2007-02-26 Thread Danilo Šegan
On Friday at 15:40, Veerapuram Varadhan wrote: > While committing the feature, the fix attached to > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401546 didn't make it in, > which is duly found and reported by Andre Klapper. As, the attached fix > adds a new string and removes the *added* UI button

  1   2   >