Re: committing updated po files

2005-10-02 Thread Christian Rose
ons 2005-09-28 klockan 15:31 +0200 skrev Tomasz Kłoczko: Le mercredi 28 septembre 2005 à 13:56 +0300, Tommi Vainikainen a écrit : On 2005-09-20T18:44:55+0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tomasz, why did you need to do this everywhere? :( I really hope there are some good reasons for

Re: committing updated po files

2005-10-02 Thread Tino Meinen
4) In case not commiting same changes by translators before someone will commit changes added by update-po target translator only must merge own/not commited yet changes using msgmerge command from #lang.po.rel file created by cvs client and without loosing single line

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-29 Thread Ross Golder
On พ., 2005-09-28 at 15:31 +0200, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Christian Persch wrote: I've been getting bounces for all messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; it appears the cvs-commits-list mails have an invalid From: address :( Indeed the 'from' address in commit e-mails is

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-28 Thread Ross Golder
On พ., 2005-09-28 at 14:37 +0200, Christian Persch wrote: I've been getting bounces for all messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; it appears the cvs-commits-list mails have an invalid From: address :( Yep, [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't always necessarily map to a real mailbox. I'll see if it can be

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-21 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le mardi 20 septembre 2005 à 22:31 +0200, Christian Persch a écrit : Hi, Le mardi 20 septembre 2005 à 17:44 +0200, Danilo Šegan a écrit : [everywhere being epiphany, metacity, gnome-control-center, gnome-panel so far.] And gail, bug-buddy, libbonoboui, evolution. I've reverted the

committing updated po files

2005-09-20 Thread Christian Persch
Hi, there's just been a thread on gnome-i18n about committing the results of a make update-po; in http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2005-September/msg00321.html Danilo correctly said that it is our *recommendation* that maintainers do NOT commit such updates. However, cvs user Tomasz

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-20 Thread Danilo Šegan
Today at 16:05, Christian Persch wrote: When and where has it been agreed to do that? I think those changes should be reverted. Yes, they should. Even more so because they not only are going to cause conflicts (which is why we do not recommend otherwise commiting the result of update-po), but

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-20 Thread Christian Persch
Hi, Le mardi 20 septembre 2005 à 17:44 +0200, Danilo Šegan a écrit : Today at 16:05, Christian Persch wrote: When and where has it been agreed to do that? I think those changes should be reverted. Yes, they should. Even more so because they not only are going to cause conflicts (which

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-20 Thread Christian Persch
Hi, Le mardi 20 septembre 2005 à 17:44 +0200, Danilo Šegan a écrit : Tomasz, why did you need to do this everywhere? :( I really hope there are some good reasons for this. Anyway, please revert all these changes. [everywhere being epiphany, metacity, gnome-control-center,

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-20 Thread Danilo Šegan
Yesterday at 22:38, Christian Persch wrote: Le mardi 20 septembre 2005 à 17:44 +0200, Danilo Šegan a écrit : Tomasz, why did you need to do this everywhere? :( I really hope there are some good reasons for this. Anyway, please revert all these changes. [everywhere being epiphany,

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-20 Thread Christian Persch
Hi, Le mercredi 21 septembre 2005 à 00:14 +0200, Danilo Šegan a écrit : Yesterday at 22:38, Christian Persch wrote: Le mardi 20 septembre 2005 à 17:44 +0200, Danilo Šegan a écrit : Tomasz, why did you need to do this everywhere? :( I really hope there are some good reasons for this.