gnome-session branched

2010-09-21 Thread Ray Strode
Hi, I've created a gnome-2-32 branch for gnome-session in order to make gtk3 build fixes on master. See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630277 For more details. --Ray ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/m

gnome-session branched for 2.14

2006-04-24 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi all, gnome-session has branched for 2.14. The 2.14 branch is gnome-2-14. HEAD is for 2.15/2.16. Known plans are: + make Kjartan happy with critical warnings crashing apps again + find someone who can review patches + make it clear that, no, I'm not a gnome-session maintainer As you can see

gnome-session branched for 2.22

2008-03-24 Thread Lucas Rocha
Hi all, I've just branched gnome-session for GNOME 2.22. The branch is 'gnome-2-22' as usual. Future development will take place in trunk. Cheers! --lucasr ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i1

gnome-session branched for 2.12

2005-11-02 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, gnome-session has been branched for 2.12. The stable branch is gnome-2-12. I don't know of any plans for HEAD: I just branched it to enable Thomas to update the splash screen for 2.13.x ;-) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___ gno

Re: gnome-session branched for 2.14

2006-04-25 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 23:45 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > Hi all, > > gnome-session has branched for 2.14. The 2.14 branch is gnome-2-14. HEAD > is for 2.15/2.16. Known plans are: > > + make Kjartan happy with critical warnings crashing apps again > + find someone who can review patches > I've b

Re: gnome-session branched for 2.14

2006-04-27 Thread Christian Rose
On 4/24/06, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > gnome-session has branched for 2.14. The 2.14 branch is gnome-2-14. HEAD > is for 2.15/2.16. Thanks much for the notice. The translation status pages will show the new branch soon. Christian ___ gno

Re: gnome-session branched for 2.22

2008-03-24 Thread Claude Paroz
Le lundi 24 mars 2008 à 22:04 +0200, Lucas Rocha a écrit : > Hi all, > > I've just branched gnome-session for GNOME 2.22. The branch is > 'gnome-2-22' as usual. Future development will take place in trunk. > > Cheers! Thanks, l10n.gnome.org updated. Claude _

Re: gnome-session branched for 2.12

2005-11-02 Thread V. van Adrighem
Op wo, 02-11-2005 te 13:24 +0100, schreef Vincent Untz: > Hi, > > gnome-session has been branched for 2.12. The stable branch is gnome-2-12. Thanks for the notice. Translation status will show branch changes upon next update. > I don't know of any plans for HEAD: I just branched it to enable Tho

gnome-panel, gnome-desktop and gnome-session branched for 2.18

2007-04-30 Thread Vincent Untz
I branched gnome-panel, gnome-desktop and gnome-session for 2.18. New development will happen in trunk. See the roadmap pages for future plans: http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap/Modules Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___ gnome-i18n mail

gnome-session branched for GNOME 2.24, from an old revision

2008-11-25 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi all, I've branched gnome-session for GNOME 2.24. The branch name is the usual gnome-2-24. Note that there was some changes that were not for 2.24 in trunk, so I had to branch from revision 5150. This means that one translation (sv) has been updated in trunk but not in gnome-2-24. Daniel, I apo

Re: gnome-panel, gnome-desktop and gnome-session branched for 2.18

2007-05-02 Thread Claude Paroz
Le lundi 30 avril 2007 à 23:53 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > I branched gnome-panel, gnome-desktop and gnome-session for 2.18. New > development will happen in trunk. Thanks. l10n.gnome.org updated. Claude ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome

Re: gnome-session branched for GNOME 2.24, from an old revision

2008-11-25 Thread Claude Paroz
Le mardi 25 novembre 2008 à 20:05 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit : > Hi all, > > I've branched gnome-session for GNOME 2.24. The branch name is the usual > gnome-2-24. > > Note that there was some changes that were not for 2.24 in trunk, so I > had to branch from revision 5150. This means that one t