possible changes in gtk translations

2015-02-26 Thread Matthias Clasen
Hi i18n team, I am itching to merge this branch in gtk: https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/log/?h=wip/matthiasc/gettext It removes the extract-string hack that we currently use to pull strings out of .ui files, and instead just relies on the glade support in new enough gettext versions. glade su

Re: possible changes in gtk translations

2015-02-26 Thread Claude Paroz
Le jeudi 26 février 2015 à 15:42 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > Hi i18n team, > > I am itching to merge this branch in gtk: > > https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/log/?h=wip/matthiasc/gettext > > It removes the extract-string hack that we currently use to pull > strings out of .ui files, and

Re: possible changes in gtk translations

2015-02-27 Thread Piotr Drąg
2015-02-26 22:12 GMT+01:00 Claude Paroz : > Le jeudi 26 février 2015 à 15:42 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit : >> Hi i18n team, >> >> I am itching to merge this branch in gtk: >> >> https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/log/?h=wip/matthiasc/gettext >> >> It removes the extract-string hack that we curren

Re: possible changes in gtk translations

2015-02-27 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Piotr Drąg wrote: > > I don't think it works. Strings from .ui files don't get extracted on > both damned-lies and locally on Fedora 21. > It works just fine here on f22, as far as I can tell: cd po rm gtk30.pot make gtk30.pot grep gtkprintunixdialog.ui gtk30.po

Re: possible changes in gtk translations

2015-02-27 Thread Piotr Drąg
27 lut 2015 22:53 "Matthias Clasen" @ gmail.com > napisał(a): > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Piotr Drąg gmail.com > wrote: > > > > > I don't think it works. Strings from .ui files don't get extracted on > > both damned-lies and locally on Fedora 21. > > > > It works just fine here on f22, as

Re: possible changes in gtk translations

2015-03-02 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Piotr Drąg wrote: > > Right, it doesn't work with intltool. Claude, can damned-lies be made to > generate gtk+'s pot file using make? Any update on this ? I don't want to ship GTK+ with incomplete translations, but I would hate to be shackled to a hack because yo

Re: possible changes in gtk translations

2015-03-02 Thread Claude Paroz
Le lundi 02 mars 2015 à 08:13 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Piotr Drąg wrote: > > > > > Right, it doesn't work with intltool. Claude, can damned-lies be made to > > generate gtk+'s pot file using make? > > Any update on this ? I don't want to ship GTK+ with

Re: possible changes in gtk translations

2015-03-02 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
Hi; On 2 March 2015 at 19:55, Claude Paroz wrote: > Le lundi 02 mars 2015 à 08:13 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit : >> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Piotr Drąg wrote: >> >> > >> > Right, it doesn't work with intltool. Claude, can damned-lies be made to >> > generate gtk+'s pot file using make?

Re: possible changes in gtk translations

2015-03-03 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: >> I'm afraid it's not possible currently. Damned Lies doesn't build >> modules. If the pot file needs a custom script to create it, the script >> should be runnable as is after a checkout, it cannot require a build. > > This should not requi

Re: possible changes in gtk translations

2015-03-03 Thread Claude Paroz
Le mardi 03 mars 2015 à 07:23 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > > >> I'm afraid it's not possible currently. Damned Lies doesn't build > >> modules. If the pot file needs a custom script to create it, the script > >> should be runnable as

Re: possible changes in gtk translations

2015-03-03 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Claude Paroz wrote: > Latest master statistics have just been updated: > https://l10n.gnome.org/module/gtk+/ great work, thanks ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/g