Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
technical correctness.
The latest committed version is online at:
http://www.gnome.org/start/2.14/notes/C/index.html
You can also check out the release n
Hey David,
overall, very nice job, as always :-)
Just a couple of comments :
* Regarding the speed improvements of the gnome log viewer, it could
be good to specify that the launch times mentioned in the article are
when loading a 2.9MB log file. Otherwise, it makes the log viewer
looks pretty bad
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 17:40 +0100, Vincent Noel wrote:
> * Regarding the speed improvements of the gnome log viewer, it could
> be good to specify that the launch times mentioned in the article are
> when loading a 2.9MB log file. Otherwise, it makes the log viewer
> looks pretty bad in any situat
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> Addendum:
> - If anyone knows the status of the LiveCD, that section requires
> updating.
As I wrote the other day I ordered a new computer but it hasn't yet
arrived. Thus I'll clear up some space on my laptop and start producing
the live
Today at 16:57, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> We are using gnome-doc-utils for translation. I hope the translators
> know how to get all of that working, because I have no idea.
For those who don't:
http://live.gnome.org/ReleaseNotes/Translating
Cheers,
Danilo
___
El lun, 06-03-2006 a las 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley escribió:
> Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
> notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
> technical correctness.
Hi Davyd
I found this little typo: "independant" instead of "indepe
On 07/03/2006, at 2:27 AM, Davyd Madeley wrote:
Warning, I AM AN AUSTRALIAN, SPELLINGS MAY BE CONSIDERED INCORRECT.
Or a refreshing return to normalcy...
from Clytie, also Australian
(vi-VN, Vietnamese free-software translation team / nhóm Việt hóa
phần mềm tự do)
http://groups-beta.goog
Oops. Forgot to CC lists.
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>
> Neat job.
>
>
> In front page:
>
> "free software" => "Free Software"
>
>
> Users -> Performance:
>
> "font rendering" => "text rendering" (we did not optimizing the
> actual drawing at all, just the text layout...)
>
> "t
Hi Davyd,
Nice work, but I noticed several (typo) mistakes in the GStreamer
section. Here is the proposed fixed/updated section with slight
rewrites to make it easier to read:
"""
GNOME 2.14 uses the technology of GStreamer 0.10. The GStreamer
multimedia framework is a powerful, pluggable audi
On 2006-03-07T11:34:25+0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> GStreamer 0.10 will also allow users to take advantage of multimedia
> plugins distributed by 3rd party vendors to offer support for licensed
> codecs for which no legal plugins are available. These may include
> support for AC3, WMA, MP3 and
Edward Hervey wrote:
> revised version 0.3.a-beta-pre25-coma-7:
>
> "Gstreamer 0.10 will also give users the possibility to use, where
>patents apply, multimedia plugins distributed by 3rd party vendors to
>offer support for licensed codecs for which no legal plugins are
>available."
>
> Does t
On 3/7/06, James Henstridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Edward Hervey wrote:
>
> > revised version 0.3.a-beta-pre25-coma-7:
> >
> > "Gstreamer 0.10 will also give users the possibility to use, where
> >patents apply, multimedia plugins distributed by 3rd party vendors to
> >offer support for lic
Hi,
I didn't mention any specific country, nor the whole world I just
said "for which no legal plugins are available." which seemed to be
the most neutral way of putting it.\
I could go on very long about the quality/benifits of licensed and
unlicensed codecs, but I think the strong point here
On Maw, 2006-03-07 at 13:44 +, Edward Hervey wrote:
> I could go on very long about the quality/benifits of licensed and
> unlicensed codecs, but I think the strong point here is that it
> *allows* both for everybody's benefits (nothing *forces* you to
> download/use them AFAIK).
Given the g
Hi Alan :)
On 3/7/06, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Maw, 2006-03-07 at 13:44 +, Edward Hervey wrote:
> > I could go on very long about the quality/benifits of licensed and
> > unlicensed codecs, but I think the strong point here is that it
> > *allows* both for everybody's benefit
On Maw, 2006-03-07 at 14:50 +, Edward Hervey wrote:
> "Gstreamer 0.10 will also give users the possibility to use, where
> patents apply, multimedia plugins distributed by 3rd party vendors to
> offer support for licensed codecs for which no legal plugins are
> available."
>
> Does that ma
On Maw, 2006-03-07 at 16:37 +, Alan Cox wrote:
> plugins are not available. The GNOME 2.14 distribution does not itself
> contain these non-free components."
Actually better yet
"contain or endorse"
Alan
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnom
Hi,
> > plugins are not available. The GNOME 2.14 distribution does not itself
> > contain these non-free components."
>
> Actually better yet
>
> "contain or endorse"
I'd be completely fine with this standpoint.
However, not everyone in the GNOME community necessarily agrees with
this. I got
Hi again,
On 3/7/06, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Maw, 2006-03-07 at 14:50 +, Edward Hervey wrote:
> > "Gstreamer 0.10 will also give users the possibility to use, where
> > patents apply, multimedia plugins distributed by 3rd party vendors to
> > offer support for licensed codec
On 08/03/2006, at 12:14 AM, Edward Hervey wrote:
I didn't mention any specific country, nor the whole world I just
said "for which no legal plugins are available." which seemed to be
the most neutral way of putting it.\
How about "for which no legal plugins may be available"? :)
from Clyti
Regarding the following paragraph:
in the file: rndevelopers.xml
..
GSlice is very similar to the kernel slab allocator and allows for fast,
memory efficent allocation of small
..
I presume that kernel would be Linux? (not KRNL386.EXE for example, or
Solaris/BSD/MacOS kernel, or just
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 15:11 +0100, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> Thomas Vander Stichele writes:
>
> > However, not everyone in the GNOME community necessarily agrees with
> > this. I got *a lot* of requests to add an mp3 recording profile to
> > gnome-media. Historically, I've always refuted these r
On 3/6/06, Davyd Madeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
> notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
> technical correctness.
I guess I found one:
release-notes.xml:42
"(...) To learn more about GNOME
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 23:30 +0100, Claus Schwarm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> two suggestion if I'm not too late already:
>
> 1.) The first sentence is too long: Please stop it after "platforms"
> otherwise people with low attention will stop reading right there.
> 2.) "includes" sounds strange. Why
Thomas Vander Stichele writes:
> However, not everyone in the GNOME community necessarily agrees with
> this. I got *a lot* of requests to add an mp3 recording profile to
> gnome-media. Historically, I've always refuted these requests because I
> agree that GNOME should not be endorsing them.
I
On 3/6/06, Davyd Madeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
> notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
> technical correctness.
>
In the very first paragraph, change:
"GNOME comprises of both a desktop and
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 08:31 -0400, Pedro de Medeiros wrote:
> On 3/6/06, Davyd Madeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
> > notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
> > technical correctness.
>
>
> I
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 14:28 -0600, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> On 3/6/06, Davyd Madeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
> > notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
> > technical correctness.
> >
>
> In
Hi,
two suggestion if I'm not too late already:
1.) The first sentence is too long: Please stop it after "platforms"
otherwise people with low attention will stop reading right there.
2.) "includes" sounds strange. Why not just remove it?
The paragraph then reads:
"GNOME 2.14 is the l
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
> notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
> technical correctness.
>
> The latest committed version is online at:
> http://www.gnome.org
Hi Bob,
Yesterday at 23:41, Bob Kashani wrote:
> I like this much better. It flows much nicer too. I made the changes.
Also note that if you want translated release notes, you'll have to be
much more strict about such changes at this time.
We are only 5 days from a release, and there are only
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:27:32AM +0100, Danilo ??egan wrote:
> With Gnome 2.12 we were very successful with translation (24
> languages!), but notes were finished two weeks before the release,
> and stabilised at least a week before release. I think it looked
> really cool on
This is basically
On 3/9/06, Davyd Madeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:27:32AM +0100, Danilo ??egan wrote:
>
> > With Gnome 2.12 we were very successful with translation (24
> > languages!), but notes were finished two weeks before the release,
> > and stabilised at least a week before re
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 07:35 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:27:32AM +0100, Danilo ??egan wrote:
>
> > With Gnome 2.12 we were very successful with translation (24
> > languages!), but notes were finished two weeks before the release,
> > and stabilised at least a week befo
Today at 0:54, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On 3/9/06, Davyd Madeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:27:32AM +0100, Danilo ??egan wrote:
>>
>> > With Gnome 2.12 we were very successful with translation (24
>> > languages!), but notes were finished two weeks before the release,
>
Today at 1:37, Bob Kashani wrote:
>> I am going to let Bob and Claus finish up with the editing, but I
>> will understand if at GUADEC, any translators want to come up and
>> punch me in the face.
Not really, if we can negotiate a truce. See below. ;)
> In general I think that you've done a real
On 10/03/2006, at 10:05 AM, Davyd Madeley wrote:
With Gnome 2.12 we were very successful with translation (24
languages!), but notes were finished two weeks before the release,
and stabilised at least a week before release. I think it looked
really cool on
This is basically my fault for suck
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
> notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
> technical correctness.
>
> The latest committed version is online at:
> http://www.gnome.org
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 14:05 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> > Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
> > notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
> > technical correctness.
> >
> > T
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 12:32 -0800, Bob Kashani wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 14:05 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> > > Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
> > > notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers f
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 14:40 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 12:32 -0800, Bob Kashani wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 14:05 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> > > > Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of
Hi,
Le lundi 06 mars 2006 à 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley a écrit :
> Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
> notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
> technical correctness.
>
> The latest committed version is online at:
> http://www
On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 10:08 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le lundi 06 mars 2006 à 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley a écrit :
> > Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
> > notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
> > technical correctnes
On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 14:23 -0800, Bob Kashani wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 10:08 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Le lundi 06 mars 2006 à 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley a écrit :
> > > Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
> > > notes for 2.14. We now requir
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 03:03:30PM -0800, Bob Kashani wrote:
> > We probably should. I have a screenshot of the sound pref. without the
> > default sound card entry. But I'm not all that great with using gimp to
> > remove the little black bits from the top corners. I'll upload it and
> > hopeful
Le samedi 11 mars 2006 à 10:08 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Le lundi 06 mars 2006 à 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley a écrit :
> > Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
> > notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
> > technical corr
Hi,
Le lundi 06 mars 2006 à 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley a écrit :
> - Does anyone want to take charge on writing a press release? I am
> willing to raise my hand again if so required.
Did anyone start working on it? Any volunteer from the marketing team?
Thanks,
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne
On 3/9/06, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le lundi 06 mars 2006 à 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley a écrit :
> > - Does anyone want to take charge on writing a press release? I am
> > willing to raise my hand again if so required.
>
> Did anyone start working on it? Any volunteer from
On 3/9/06, Rajiv Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/9/06, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Le lundi 06 mars 2006 à 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley a écrit :
> > > - Does anyone want to take charge on writing a press release? I am
> > > willing to raise my hand again if so req
49 matches
Mail list logo
