vte branches

2013-06-01 Thread Christian Persch
Hi; I noticed that translators are committing to vte master. However, there are no planned releases from master for the forseeable future; all work is going on in the vte-0-34 branch. (And https://l10n.gnome.org/module/vte/ incorrectly lists master as 'string frozen'.) There will be a new vte re

Re: incorrect & missing vte branches

2012-10-02 Thread Andre Klapper
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 21:26 +0200, Christian Persch wrote: > > However, it would be nice to get such information before we go into > > the string freeze. No one of us is continuously tracking all the > > branch creations in Git. > > Since vte doesn't use the gnome-x-y branch scheme, it's probably

Re: incorrect & missing vte branches

2012-10-02 Thread Christian Persch
Hi; Am Tue, 02 Oct 2012 21:21:43 +0200 schrieb Mario Blättermann : > Am 02.10.2012 21:13, schrieb Christian Persch: > > I just noticed at http://l10n.gnome.org/module/vte/ that i18n is > > apparently using the wrong vte branches: - master is *NOT* string > > frozen - the vt

Re: incorrect & missing vte branches

2012-10-02 Thread Mario Blättermann
Hi Christian, Am 02.10.2012 21:13, schrieb Christian Persch: > Hi; > > I just noticed at http://l10n.gnome.org/module/vte/ that i18n is > apparently using the wrong vte branches: - master is *NOT* string > frozen - the vte-0-34 branch that is string-frozen and used for gnome &g

incorrect & missing vte branches

2012-10-02 Thread Christian Persch
Hi; I just noticed at http://l10n.gnome.org/module/vte/ that i18n is apparently using the wrong vte branches: - master is *NOT* string frozen - the vte-0-34 branch that is string-frozen and used for gnome 3.6, is missing - the vte-0-32 branch for gnome 3.4 is missing as well, but that'