Philip Withnall commented:
[Using Meson 0.60.1](https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/merge_requests/2339)
on our CI seems to fix the problem. I don’t know why, and I don’t know exactly
which Meson version fixes things (I picked 0.60.1 because it was the latest
release, and we have no need
Philip Withnall commented:
It didn’t fail like this before, although it’s difficult to be entirely sure
whether this is due to GLib bumping its Meson dependency, the CI changing, or
something else.
Meson
[warns](https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/blob/master/mesonbuild/compilers/mixins
Philip Withnall created an issue:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/722
The GLib CI is [failing on
macos](https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/jobs/1595607) with
```
Objective-C compiler for the host machine: cc (clang 10.0.0)
Objective-C linker for the host
Philip Withnall commented on a discussion:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/719#note_1299164
Thanks! :heart:
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/719#note_1299164
You&#x
Philip Withnall created an issue:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/719
I accidentally created [the 2.70.2
tag](https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/tags/2.70.2) for GLib when I
released 2.70.1. I’ve created the correct 2.70.1 tag and pushed it. Would it be
Philip Withnall commented:
I can vouch for Frederic!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/516#note_1022826
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnom
Philip Withnall commented:
+1 from me. Note that Phaedrus is already in
[`gnome-software.doap`](https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/blob/master/gnome-software.doap#L27-32)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure
Philip Withnall created an issue:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/489
Can you please archive the
[gnome-software-list](https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-software-list/).
We’re moving to [Discourse](https://discourse.gnome.org/tags/gnome-software
Philip Withnall commented:
Analysis is done here:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/pwithnall/gnome-environmental-analysis/-/tree/master/guadec-2020/README.md
tl;dr: Looks like GUADEC 2020 resulted in up to 0.5–1tCO2e emissions
I’ll blog about this soon. Thanks again @barthalion!
--
Reply to this
Philip Withnall commented:
Thanks @barthalion! I’ll blog about it once I’ve done the analysis.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/372#note_889267
You're receiving this email because of your accou
Issue was closed by Philip Withnall
Issue #372: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/372
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/372
You're receiving this email because of your accou
Philip Withnall commented:
OK, I’m back now and ready to analyse the data whenever you get a chance to
extract it :)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/372#note_883632
You're receiving this email becau
Philip Withnall commented:
(Shifting the due date to when we expect to extract data)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/372#note_872006
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnom
Philip Withnall commented:
> It has been deployed on OSCP nodes and meet.gnome.org via Docker image I
> created myself (data is stored in Docker volume) and directly on gesture and
> scale (hypervisors/database nodes) after I found proper combination of
> packages. When do you
Philip Withnall commented:
@barthalion, how does the service file look? Ideally it needs to be installed
on the servers ASAP in order to get some pre-GUADEC baseline data.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues
Philip Withnall commented:
OK, here’s the service and timer file which I’ve written. They should be
self-contained and can just be dropped into `/etc/systemd/system`, then
`systemctl daemon-reload; systemctl enable --now co2-stats.{service,timer}`.
The timer runs every 30 minutes and the
Philip Withnall commented:
I’m putting the script together now, and was wondering if the machine has
inbuilt power monitoring hardware. Is it possible for one of you to run `sudo
find /sys -type f -name power_now` on the machine now and tell me the output?
If the machine has an appropriate
Philip Withnall commented:
Setting the due date for just before GUADEC begins, since there’s no point
otherwise. :)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/372#note_859955
You're receiving this email becau
Philip Withnall created an issue:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/372
In order to be able to compare the carbon emissions from GUADEC 2020 against
previous (and future) GNOME conferences, it would be really useful if some data
could be collected from the
Philip Withnall commented:
/cc @nielsdg
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/187#note_612204
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnom
Philip Withnall created an issue:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/187
### Requested details
1. The list name:
* `gir-devel-list`
* `gnome-contacts-list`
2. The rationale on why the mailing list should be archived (i.e project
unmaintained)
* Both
Hey,
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, at 15:45, Andrea Veri wrote:
> Philip,
>
> replies in line :)
Thanks!
> Il giorno ven 16 ago 2019 alle ore 12:55 Philip Withnall
> ha scritto:
> > Particularly, I would like to know:
> > • The bandwidth our services used each year, for the
Hey,
For my GUADEC talk, I’m wondering if you could answer some statistical
questions about the GNOME servers. I need it a few days before the
start of GUADEC, at the latest. If that’s not possible, then I’ll try
and estimate the numbers as best I can.
I tried to find this information online, but
Philip Withnall commented:
Not sure all of the analyses Fred was doing could be done with elastic search,
could they?
--
View it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/6#note_445410
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnom
Philip Withnall commented:
> @averi I think also this Issue should be reopened. The concerns behind GOA,
> and recent Google's Policy Updates are still a matter, for now.
No, this issue is about verifying the domain ownership. Please file
self-contained, discrete tasks for differ
Philip Withnall commented:
Next steps, which need to be done for both projects:
* GNOME 20161213 (`gnome-20161213`)
* GNOME old (`solar-center-818`)
1. Add `gnome.org` as a verified domain on the account
[here](https://console.developers.google.com/apis/credentials/domainverification?project
Philip Withnall commented:
@averi, what’s the GNOME infrastructure account’s e-mail address?
--
View it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/80#note_422294
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnom
New Issue was created.
Issue 80: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/80
Author:Philip Withnall
Assignee:
As per
* https://developers.google.com/terms/api-services-user-data-policy
* https://support.google.com/cloud/answer/9110914?hl=en&ref_topic=3473162
we
You are reading this message because you are a watcher of the Mailman queue at
GNOME.org Request Tracker.
Mon Jun 09 16:41:56 2014: Request 14390 was acted upon.
Transaction: Ticket created by phi...@tecnocode.co.uk
Queue: Mailman
Subject: Request for GIR ailing list
Owner: Nob
Hi,
I mentioned this on desktop-devel a few days ago, but that probably
wasn't the right place for it to get noticed.
The Hitori repository[1] didn't get migrated to git properly, and is
currently empty. Maybe it's because it was added to SVN after the git
preview migrations were done? Regardless
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 15:12 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> Owen and I discussed doing repository groups in cgit using
> the category property in each module's doap file. Attached
> is a patch to make this happen on the server.
>
> Categories in doap are resources, which means they're given
> using
31 matches
Mail list logo
