On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 14:31 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>> Hi Sergey,
>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
>> > Would it make sense to consolidate all HW+GL-related information
>> > (requirements) on a single page
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
>> My understanding is roughly at least for Intel "any card ≥ i915/945",
>> though i915 is about the very minimum. We do need to get recent data
>> about ATI and NVIDIA; can anyone help
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Allan E. Registos <
allan.regis...@smpc.steniel.com.ph> wrote:
> On Saturday, 30 April, 2011 09:40 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
>
> == Suspend instead of Shutdown ==
>>
>> Surely this has been discussed extensively, I just want to mention that
>> suspend si
I'm not suggesting the Terminal for everyday usage. I'm just trying to get
some hardware and pm-utils stats so we can solve the problem for other
users... all that command will do is print out "Supported" or "Not
Supported", just as a starting point for the hellish journey ahead of us:
Debugging Li
On Saturday, 30 April, 2011 09:40 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
== Suspend instead of Shutdown ==
Surely this has been discussed extensively, I just want to mention
that suspend simply does not work for me (tested on two computers,
both do not wake up correctly).
I gues
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 11:15 +1200, John Stowers wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 17:41 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 14:31 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > > Hi Sergey,
> > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
> > > > Would it make sense to consolida
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 17:41 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 14:31 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > Hi Sergey,
> > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
> > > Would it make sense to consolidate all HW+GL-related information
> > > (requirements) on a single
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 14:31 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> Hi Sergey,
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
> > Would it make sense to consolidate all HW+GL-related information
> > (requirements) on a single page on live.gnome.org? Minimal list of
> > extensions, hints ("do not
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> My understanding is roughly at least for Intel "any card ≥ i915/945",
> though i915 is about the very minimum. We do need to get recent data
> about ATI and NVIDIA; can anyone help fill in?
I have a working Shell on a R300 (mobility Radeon 9
2011/5/1 Olav Vitters :
> On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 02:31:11PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>> My understanding is roughly at least for Intel "any card ≥ i915/945",
>> though i915 is about the very minimum. We do need to get recent data
>> about ATI and NVIDIA; can anyone help fill in?
>
> Could we g
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 02:31:11PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> My understanding is roughly at least for Intel "any card ≥ i915/945",
> though i915 is about the very minimum. We do need to get recent data
> about ATI and NVIDIA; can anyone help fill in?
Could we gather this automatically? I thou
Hi Sergey,
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
>
> Would it make sense to consolidate all HW+GL-related information
> (requirements) on a single page on live.gnome.org? Minimal list of
> extensions, hints ("do not use this driver, do not use those chips,
> etc")
I think we re
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 12:07 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> There's a gradient background for apps that are running.
Wow! I can see it now that you mention it [ for someone with impaired
color perception it doesn't really jump out and slap me ].
Thanks, I was just wondering about that.
__
13 matches
Mail list logo
