On Sunday, 22 May, 2011 11:25 AM, Ryan Peters wrote:
That is to say, they are forced them to re-learn and cannot see the
benefit. Moreover when one of them persists, there is always a
convenient answer that involves relearning with a small dose of who
cares that it's a bit harder to do x.
On Monday, 23 May, 2011 01:32 AM, jordan wrote:
Will you please stop this? I'm sorry, but you are refusing to give any good
examples whatsoever of how it's harder to use the interface and this thread
is going in circles because of it (which you blame on me, which isn't the
case at all).
On Monday, 23 May, 2011 09:41 AM, Bill Dwyer wrote:
Nic to know the Dev team doesn't care about what the users think.
A recipe for disaster for any project for sure. Many of you will think
why some people like me was still reading this list, I just want to know
or get informed on user
On Monday, 23 May, 2011 12:30 PM, jordan wrote:
hi Allen,
This is one I think is a valid concern, I will also be using Multimedia
apps for recording and it looks like GNOME Shell is not the right _desktop_
_shell_ at this rate. I remember one poster here who complains, but with no
solution
On Thursday, 19 May, 2011 03:54 AM, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
Also, the critics saying that GNOME Shell is one size fits all must
have never looked at the extensions or third-party programs yet. There
are already places menus, drive menus, alternative status menus, docks,
launchers on the panel,