On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 15:42 -0400, G. Michael Carter wrote:
> In this case it doesn't. I get the option "LOGOFF" and that's it.
> (With an unhappy computer icon in the centre)Bottom line I
> couldn't see the fallback get the attention that a non-3d session
> would so would be better to upgra
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 13:50 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 12:10 -0400, G. Michael Carter wrote:
> > > Can I get confirmation that r100 and r200 will not work with gnome
> shell?
> > >
>
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 13:50 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 12:10 -0400, G. Michael Carter wrote:
> > Can I get confirmation that r100 and r200 will not work with gnome shell?
> >
> > "gnome-shell isn't expected to work on r100 (or r200) you need &
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 12:10 -0400, G. Michael Carter wrote:
> Can I get confirmation that r100 and r200 will not work with gnome shell?
>
> "gnome-shell isn't expected to work on r100 (or r200) you need >= r300 for
> radeon cards for it to work."
> https://bu
Can I get confirmation that r100 and r200 will not work with gnome shell?
"gnome-shell isn't expected to work on r100 (or r200) you need >= r300 for
radeon cards for it to work."
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679264
__
