Re: GNOME3 & 3D Compatibility [Was: Applications Compatibility]

2011-05-26 Thread Allan E. Registos
On 5/25/2011 5:57 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Allen, you would have noticed i gave examples as to where > gnome-shell/mutter was anything BUT robust. One trip to youtube and > watching gnome-shell reviews will show you that it isn't as robust as > you think. I've watched you-tube videos an

Re: GNOME3 & 3D Compatibility [Was: Applications Compatibility]

2011-05-25 Thread jordan
>> possibly biased benchmarks made by developers, who clearly want people >> to use Mutter/gnome-shell and not compiz? your own eyes?? (in which > > Please don't insult people or question people's credibility.  That is > unfounded and rude. I wasn't insulting anyone or attacking anybodies credibil

GNOME3 & 3D Compatibility [Was: Applications Compatibility]

2011-05-25 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 00:20 -0400, jordan wrote: > > I've had the opposite experience. With compiz and multi-head (second > > display) acceleration usually got disabled and was at best hit-n-miss. > I have 2 displays and am running compiz 0.9.5 (with nvidia), no > problems at all - full hardware a