On 12 Jan, 22:34, Toby Cubitt wrote:
> Indeed, although I should point out that I have no intention of
> extending it to anything remotely approaching a full VCS. There
> are full VCS's for that ;-)
I do wonder where we're headed if this catches on, which it should.
(Unfortunately, there are not
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:39:04AM -0800, Vegard Øye wrote:
> thank you so much for writing undo-tree.el. I have been using it for
> some days now, and it just feels ontologically right: undo history
> /is/ a tree, as everyone who has used a version control system knows.
> Indeed, th
Toby,
thank you so much for writing undo-tree.el. I have been using it for
some days now, and it just feels ontologically right: undo history
/is/ a tree, as everyone who has used a version control system knows.
Indeed, the package is essentially a miniature VCS for buffer states!
There is a
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 09:21:14PM -0700, Samuel Wales wrote:
> Message for Toby.
>
> (Toby's email doesn't work.)
Short answer: it works just fine. But if for some reason you do hit
problems, use the address given in the undo-tree.el file (which is what
you should be doing any
Message for Toby.
(Toby's email doesn't work.)
On 2009-12-05, Samuel Wales wrote:
> Still enjoying the package.
>
> Bug (muahahaha).
>
> It seems to put point in the wrong place sometimes. It would be good
> to see all changes that are made by an undo or a redo. Sometimes you
> are in a place,
> does not store it) is visibility. If you are in org-mode, and you
> undo, you want the folding state of subtrees to be as it was, else you
> can undo stuff that is hidden etc. I wonder if that is possible, or,
> if not, if Emacs can be made to support it for your package.
Since folding state i
On 2009-11-29 19:03 +, Toby Cubitt wrote:
> Appologies for posting three versions in quick succession, but I'd like
> to get one version that compiles and works correctly, and I seem to be
> incapable of this.
>
> Third time lucky...
It is great fun seeing this package mature ;)
Leo
__
Hi Toby,
This package addresses all of my undo concerns! (I recently posted a
slightly humorous explanation at
http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.emacs.help/msg/b802df52522533f8 .)
I would be delighted if it were integrated into emacs!
FWIW, I found that characterp was not a function in Carbon E
I like it and would be interested in integrating something along these
lines into Emacs, but it would need to be integrated with the existing
undo system.
If you look at the implementation of undo-only, you'll see that the
undo-equiv-table gives at least a large part of the data that is
necessary t
