actually that's all, there's barely branding on Arch itself.
we're looking into it anyway :)
Good, on both counts.
does rebranding count as a derived work? we're discussing it right now.
Why do you ask?
It would seem so to me. If you change the strings in the installer, for
exampl
El 05/01/11 12:11, Karl Berry dijo:
> 1. The Parabola developers perform no rebranding of any kind. This
> results in the installer claiming to the "Arch Linux". I've also
> found that the GRUB menu lists it as "Arch Linux" when booting, and
> so does the login prompt. (There's prob
1. The Parabola developers perform no rebranding of any kind. This
results in the installer claiming to the "Arch Linux". I've also
found that the GRUB menu lists it as "Arch Linux" when booting, and
so does the login prompt. (There's probably more, I imagine but
that's where I
El 04/01/11 09:24, Jason Self dijo:
> Nicolás Reynolds wrote:
>
> > you hit a known bug on our repo that we're
> > working to solve.
>
> Ah; so including kernel26-2.6.36.2-1.src.tar.gz, with its non-free bits,
> is a bug. Good. :)
that's correct.
> > our own build scripts are here [0], and ker
Nicolás Reynolds wrote:
> you hit a known bug on our repo that we're
> working to solve.
Ah; so including kernel26-2.6.36.2-1.src.tar.gz, with its non-free bits,
is a bug. Good. :)
> our own build scripts are here [0], and kernel's is here [1], where you can
> find that the linux sources are be
El 03/01/11 03:20, Jason Self dijo:
> Parabola is a GNU/Linux distro that claims to be a fully free copy of Arch.
> In
> reviewing it I have some concerns:
>
> 1. The Parabola developers perform no rebranding of any kind. This results in
> the installer claiming to the "Arch Linux". I've also f
