Re: [GNU-linux-libre] MAME license non-free

2011-04-05 Thread Graziano Sorbaioli
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 23:00:54 +0200, Rubén Rodríguez wrote: I thought MAME was an old-timer in Debian non-free (making it at least suspicious), but apparently it only just got added. It just entered Ubuntu universe with maverick, replacing sdlmame (which was in multiverse). Maybe they are relaxi

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] MAME license non-free

2011-04-05 Thread Rubén Rodríguez
> I thought MAME was an old-timer in Debian non-free (making it at > least suspicious), but apparently it only just got added. It just entered Ubuntu universe with maverick, replacing sdlmame (which was in multiverse). Maybe they are relaxing their policies a bit more.

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] MAME license non-free

2011-04-05 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Rubén Rodríguez wrote: The license for the MAME package restricts commercial distribution: "Redistributions may not be sold, nor may they be used in a commercial product or activity." I'm adding it to the blacklist. I thought MAME was an old-timer in Debian non-free (making it at least suspi