Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-08 Thread Luke Shumaker
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 09:22:00 -0400, coadde wrote: > On 06/07/2016 10:16 PM, Luke Shumaker wrote: > > > > # What's going on with the official version? # > >

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-08 Thread Luke Shumaker
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 01:21:27 -0400, André Silva wrote: > > He did essentially several search/replaces: > > - "ArchLinux" -> "Arch" or "Arch GNU/Linux" > >Saying "Arch GNU/Linux" is wrong, it should be "Arch Linux". > >"Arch" is acceptable shorthand after the first use. > > So, why FSF art

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-08 Thread Luke Shumaker
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 11:43:04 -0400, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: > Well, unless I was really blind, I couldn't see the original sender > (Luke Shumaker?) saying anything about "FOSS". I didn't start the thread, but it was my email that André was directly replying to in the first email that went t

[GNU-linux-libre] review PureOS ISO

2016-06-08 Thread Adrian Alves
Hello FSF, We are Puri.sm our gnu/linux  PureOS is a free based debian distro, can you guys review it. We not only use Free software without any "contrib" or "non-free" software also our kernel is deblob'd We offer PureOS together with our laptops and also to any people who wants to use it: links

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-08 Thread coadde
On 06/08/2016 12:43 PM, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: > Well, unless I was really blind, I couldn't see the original sender > (Luke Shumaker?) saying anything about "FOSS". Yes it's right! he never means FOSS, however his thinking is based on it about operating system terms for Parabola and Arch

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-08 Thread Adonay Felipe Nogueira
I'm currently not subscribed to: d...@lists.parabola.nu gnu-linux-libre@nongnu.org ... So if you want to reply to me, please include me as recipient, or reply to: libreplanet-disc...@libreplanet.org . ... Back to the topic now: Mind if I offer my opinions? Well, unless I was really blind, I co

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-08 Thread Richard Stallman
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > He did essentially several search/replaces: > > - "ArchLinux" -> "Arch" or "

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-08 Thread André Silva
Hi guys, i'm sending a copy of this email to libreplanet-discuss, gnu-linux-libre and rms to get a better consensus for our Social Contract since Parabola is a distro endorsed by FSF and our Social Contract is a very important point to be discussed. Note: Lukeshu [0], Coadde [1] and me (Emulatorma

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-08 Thread coadde
On 06/07/2016 10:16 PM, Luke Shumaker wrote: > > # What's going on with the official version? # > > > In 2014-2015, Coadde ma