On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 09:46:50 +0100
Jaromil wrote:
> > Assuming that this is done, and that the distribution is FSDG
> > compliant, and listed in the fsf website, it is strongly advised to
> > find a way to verify if the websites that are being visited can
> > distinguish between Tails[3] and it's
On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 11:16:00 +
Kurtis Hanna wrote:
> It's funny that you could use the Heads bios replacement program to
> boot into Heads the distribution once it is published. Ha ha. A
> Heads+Heads stack! That's almost as funny as a Heads+Tails stack.
When you think about it, making the bo
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 20:05:52 -0600
Isaac David wrote:
> It could very well be free by now, but only if you are willing to
> overlook the fact that it's not actually being built from sources.
> The chromium repository still distributes and uses some object
> code, instead of the original free libr
On 01/15/2017 08:46 AM, Jaromil wrote:
> I'll take the occasion to pose a question we have unanswered at the
> moment: because of our plan to make heads really secure, the wish is
> that of applying the -grsec patch to linux-libre.
>
> is there any concern regarding the free nature of the -grsec pa
Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:04:44 +0100
> hellekin wrote:
>
>> Parazyd is working on https://heads.dyne.org/
> There is also a HEADS distribution at
> https://github.com/osresearch/heads
This github project by osresearch is more of a Tails version of
Libreboot.org than a FO
hello everyone,
> hellekin wrote:
> > Parazyd is working on https://heads.dyne.org/
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote:
> There is also a HEADS distribution at
> https://github.com/osresearch/heads
Parazyd's heads was first. The "persistent-tails" just came after our
announced i
