Jason Self transcribed 0.4K bytes:
> Oh, and we also have similar efforts with things like GNU IceCat and
> Trisquel's Abrowser. It probably makes more sense to work together and
> not fragment efforts by starting yet another modified version of a
> Firefox-based browser.
I think there's a
It appears that Battle for Wesnoth is considering changing their policy
in regards to which licenses are allowed in their add-ons repository.
Here is a briefing of the situation (from a conversation in #fsf IRC
channel, only joins/quits and unrelated messages were removed):
Oh, and we also have similar efforts with things like GNU IceCat and
Trisquel's Abrowser. It probably makes more sense to work together and
not fragment efforts by starting yet another modified version of a
Firefox-based browser.
It seems to have redistribution problems similar to Firefox, along
with the misunderstanding that free software isn't about cost. It can
be modified, and then a re-branded version could be distributed free
of those problems, but this is also true of Firefox so I'm not sure
what benefit there is
