On 01/20/2018 01:54 PM, Caleb Herbert wrote:
>
>> So in some ways maybe it could be seen as similar to RPM Fusion?
>
> That's what I think, and it makes sense that the RPM Fusion method was
> accepted, because the FSDG derives from Fedora guidelines.
to be clear, the "RPM Fusion method" is acc
On 01/20/2018 12:34 AM, Jean Louis wrote:
>
> The question is does the update of the Intel
> Management Engine constitute part of the operating
> system or not?
the FSDG does not make any distinction as to whether or not non-free
software in question is part of the OS - the issue is whether or n
my first though this morning was to claim a highly coveted GNU-Buck by
reporting the purio.sm non-free repos as this does appear to be exactly
the same thing that makes debian nonFSDG; but after some thought, i
realizedthere is a distinction in that debian exists solely for the
purpose of producing
Alexandre -
thanks for that detailed explanation - i have been curious about this
myself - i must say though that it did not address what is the actual
behavior preventing the debian kernel from being acceptable, which as i
understand is not related to its ability to load any modules but simply
th
On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 21:28:47 -0500,
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2018, Caleb Herbert wrote:
>
> > wouldn't dropping them from the list act as a wake-up call
> > to hurry up?
>
> Maybe that would be too drastic. After all, even if old and
> unmaintained, it's still Free Software. Perhaps
> So in some ways maybe it could be seen as similar to RPM Fusion?
That's what I think, and it makes sense that the RPM Fusion method was
accepted, because the FSDG derives from Fedora guidelines.
By the way, does anybody know where I can see a version-by-version
comparison of the Fedora guidel
The GNU FSDG comes from the Fedora guidelines. If you look at Fedora,
you'll see that there is a very clear separation of repositories,
because the repos were created independently once some random group of
people felt the need for proprietary software. The relationship between
distro and repo re
Le Sat, 20 Jan 2018 14:32:39 +0100,
Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli a écrit :
> It would also be nice to have more FSDG distributions, for instance I
> came across Hyperblola[3], which claims to be FSDG compliant. I didn't
> find it in the official list of FSDG compliant distributions[4].
Hyperbola is cu
On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 21:16:49 -0800 (PST)
"Jason Self" wrote:
> Another problematic point seems their statement that "all new laptop
> shipments include Meltdown and Spectre patches, as they will have the
> latest PureOS image (that includes the Meltdown patch) preloaded"
There are Software patches
And, while we're on the topic, I'd like to remind everyone that it's
been more than 3 years since LibertyBSD was released.
On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 12:45:47 -0800
Ivan Zaigralin wrote:
> I think this is a very good idea. I have to confess, we are not feeling very
> confident while FreeSlack is stall
10 matches
Mail list logo
