Thanks, Jaromil.
It appears that there are a few different issues going on.
It looks like you're trying to compile FreeWRT, not LibreWRT. Our project
is located at http://librewrt.org.
Even if you turn your attention to LibreWRT, it looks like the device
you're referring to requires proprietary
Jaromil jaro...@dyne.org wrote ..
my problem with android OS is that, besides it not being free and not
being freeable also in my opinion, it uses Java language which i also
dislike very much.. :)
so what i was looking recently into was Maemo, especially because
Jebba (BLAG's old chap) got
Graziano wrote:
Personally I disagree.
Do we need *another* irc channel?
We already have many similar ones.
IMHO this mailing list is a better tool.
Yes -- if for no other reason than the conversations and decisions are
archived. :)
Using the first google android developer phone, the ADP1 or even the
htc dream, you could make/receive calls using only free software.
Didn't they still have the proprietary GSM firmware though?
There is a project [1] working to create a free software replacement for that,
and the Neo
Joshua Ismael wrote:
Archlinux has an automatic building system in wich you
provide some information and the script automatically
build them.
For Parabola GNU/Linux we provide scripts for deblobing
while building so anyone can compile it's linux-libre kernel
from the vanilla source.
If
Nicolás Reynolds wrote:
you hit a known bug on our repo that we're
working to solve.
Ah; so including kernel26-2.6.36.2-1.src.tar.gz, with its non-free bits,
is a bug. Good. :)
our own build scripts are here [0], and kernel's is here [1], where you can
find that the linux sources are being
Parabola is a GNU/Linux distro that claims to be a fully free copy of Arch. In
reviewing it I have some concerns:
1. The Parabola developers perform no rebranding of any kind. This results in
the installer claiming to the Arch Linux. I've also found that the GRUB menu
lists it as Arch Linux
Henry Jensen wrote:
Hello,.
a user of my distro asked if we can include dosemu, another user said, that
we can't because dosemu has freedom issues.
To quote the user:
the DOS part needs OpenWatcom (OSS, but NOT libre) or TurboC/TurboC++
(gratis not libre) to build. The DOS part refers
In light of Debian's recent announcement [1] I and others were interested in how
well the Debian folks cleaned up their kernel. I proceeded to grab the source
for the Squeeze kernel, ran the linux-libre deblobbing script on it, and then
diffed it against the original to see what had changed.
The
John Sullivan jo...@fsf.org wrote ..
If this log shows that there is still nonfree firmware in
the kernel...
There does seem to be. For example /Documentation/video4linux/extract_xc3028.pl
is still around. The program itself is free software, but its sole purpose
appears to be extracting
More about emulators in general, since we've already determined this particular
one to have freedom-related problems.
Apparently there are resources ([1], [2]) available to learn how to
write your own game.
And if someone were to create one, or have a copy of one of those that Matt
mentioned
Nicolás Reynolds fa...@kiwwwi.com.ar wrote ..
Thanks for replying, but I think that applies for virtualbox PUEL,
which is nonfree altogether, but what about the Open Source Edition
(GPL2)?
As I understand it, there are two version of VirtualBox (one free, one
proprietary) but only one version
Carlos Javier wrote:
(Translated to English)
...we will have no choice but to use a distro with a non-free kernel.
On the contrary: Absolutely anyone can live in freedom if they make the
effort.
That may mean replacing hardware if it requires proprietary
user-subjugating software with
Sam Geeraerts wrote:
[1] says please ask the distribution's maintainers if they want to
follow these free software principles. If they do, and they would like
their distribution to be listed here, they should write to
g...@gnu.org.. That gave me the impression that FSF/GNU had the review
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
