Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [libreplanet-discuss] QTWebengine is nonfree

2017-01-22 Thread Richard Stallman
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > hopefully people migrating to the chromium engine are sympathetic with > the co

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [libreplanet-discuss] QTWebengine is nonfree

2017-01-15 Thread Hanno Böck
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 20:05:52 -0600 Isaac David wrote: > It could very well be free by now, but only if you are willing to > overlook the fact that it's not actually being built from sources. > The chromium repository still distributes and uses some object > code, instead of the original free libr

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [libreplanet-discuss] QTWebengine is nonfree

2017-01-14 Thread Isaac David
Le lun. 9 janv. 2017 à 15:24, Hanno Böck a écrit : I've read through the entire thread now and tried to follow the links, yet I can't find any evidence for the claim that chromium is nonfree. It could very well be free by now, but only if you are willing to overlook the fact that it's not act

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [libreplanet-discuss] QTWebengine is nonfree

2017-01-09 Thread fauno
Hanno Böck writes: > I'd also want to note that there are good reasons why people want to > move from webkit to the chrome rendering engine. Many applications > using webkit have been stuck with unfixed security vulnerabilities in > the past. The chromium engine is well maintained and generally at