Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] QTWebengine is nonfree

2017-01-08 Thread Luke
On 01/08/2017 07:05 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > This sounds like a big probl

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] QTWebengine is nonfree

2017-01-08 Thread André Silva
On 01/08/2017 02:48 PM, philcantor wrote: > Returning to the original topic, QT and KDE were previously using > QTWebkit. Webkit does remain fully free software, and Webkit2 is under > active development. > > It is not just a port of the core HTML/CSS rendering engine, *it is the > entire > Chromi

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] QTWebengine is nonfree

2017-01-07 Thread Alejandro
F..CK!! What the hell is thinking KDE? I like KDE, but their compromise with Libresoftware is repetedly insuficient. G El 8 de enero de 2017 3:15:44 CET, "André Silva" escribió: >Hi guys, since Chromium is blacklisted as nonfree software [0] we have >a >serious issue. KDE is mi

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] QTWebengine is nonfree

2017-01-07 Thread Luke
On 01/08/2017 05:01 AM, fauno wrote: > André Silva writes: > >> Hi guys, since Chromium is blacklisted as nonfree software [0] we have a >> serious issue. KDE is migrating their apps to QTWebEngine which contains >> Chromium as the embed engine inside it. [1] >> >> Blacklisting it could be a solut

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] QTWebengine is nonfree

2017-01-07 Thread fauno
André Silva writes: > Hi guys, since Chromium is blacklisted as nonfree software [0] we have a > serious issue. KDE is migrating their apps to QTWebEngine which contains > Chromium as the embed engine inside it. [1] > > Blacklisting it could be a solution, however since it's an engine, a lot > of