On 01/23/2017 12:00 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> > The situation has defini
On 01/23/2017 12:00 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> Would someone here like to m
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
Would someone here like to make a web page
_addressed to non-wizards_
explaining all
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> The situation has definitely improved since the last Debian Lintian
> report. I
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> We have no reliable way of controlling fingerprinting API's in an
> embedded Ch
On 01/17/2017 02:57 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> > I've reached out to ungo
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> I've reached out to ungoogled-chromium as well since the project spends
> a con
On 01/10/2017 03:27 AM, Julie Marchant wrote:
> On 01/09/2017 09:47 PM, Luke wrote:
>> _Copyright: UNKNOWN - 286 occurrences
>> __License: BSD *(guessed)* - 1017 occurrences
>> License: *No copyright* UNKNOWN - 71 occurrences
>> _
>> File list available here:
>> http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.or
On 01/09/2017 09:47 PM, Luke wrote:
> _Copyright: UNKNOWN - 286 occurrences
> __License: BSD *(guessed)* - 1017 occurrences
> License: *No copyright* UNKNOWN - 71 occurrences
> _
> File list available here:
> http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/c/chromium-browser/chromium-browser_
On 01/10/2017 01:17 AM, Julie Marchant wrote:
> On 01/09/2017 04:24 PM, Hanno Böck wrote:
>> I think if there are concerns about the free'ness of chromium they
>> should be substantiated.
> I would like to echo this sentiment. It's been something of a meme for
> years that Chromium has proprietary
On 01/09/2017 04:24 PM, Hanno Böck wrote:
> I think if there are concerns about the free'ness of chromium they
> should be substantiated.
I would like to echo this sentiment. It's been something of a meme for
years that Chromium has proprietary components, but the actual
components that are suppos
Hi,
On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 23:15:44 -0300
André Silva wrote:
> Hi guys, since Chromium is blacklisted as nonfree software [0] we
> have a serious issue. KDE is migrating their apps to QTWebEngine
> which contains Chromium as the embed engine inside it. [1]
I've read through the entire thread now an
On 01/08/2017 01:06 PM, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> I guess that we could contact the KDE project and tell them the issue so
> they can rethink about their move.
Would you like report about it to them? it could be a good idea.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
13 matches
Mail list logo
