Adonay Felipe Nogueira writes:
> Also, for those following this discussion, take note of the recent
> contributions made to the still incomplete review in the FSD[1],
> particularly the "Known issues" section that is already a blocker
> regardless if the review is finished or not.
>
> [1] https:/
Hi there,
Em 19/02/2019 01:42, Jason Self escreveu:
> I decided to spend some time looking into Chromium, ungoogled-chromium,
> and Guix's methods, and the GNU FSDG.
Thank you for taking the time to review this software along with me
(despite the fact that I mistakenly started doing the review
Hello Jason,
Jason Self writes:
> On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 17:18 +0100, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
>> do you have the bug number now?
>
> 34565
>
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34565
thank you for the reference!
for all Guix ungoogled-chromium package DRM I'll continue on that bug
On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 17:18 +0100, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
> do you have the bug number now?
34565
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34565
It seems to be disabled at build time only.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:18:19 +0100 Giovanni wrote:
> I agree: please someone involved
> https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:FreedSoftware could complete the
> info for chromium on
> https://libreplanet.org/wiki/List_of_software_that_does_not_respect_the_Free_System_Distribution_Guidelines#chromium-b
Hello Jason,
Jason Self writes:
[...]
> My proposal would be to mention these items in the chromium-browser
> entry on the libreplanet wiki either in addition to or in place of the
> current references of licensing problems that the wiki page has.
I agree: please someone involved
https://libre