On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 11:32 +, Bernd Jendrissek wrote:
> The reason I wonder is that there is still an awful lot of old software
> floating around that is still useful to some people, and for all I know
> the source code may be lost forever. Supposing the copyright holder can
> be tracked down
From: Sunny Dubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: NYLUG-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:30:01 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [nylug-talk] TOMORROW! New York Linux User's Group Meeting 2/22:
Arthur Tyde (Levanta) -on- MapFS
REMINDER: This meeting is tomorrow, RSVP closes at 4:30pm TOMORROW
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:32:11 + (UTC)
"Bernd Jendrissek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Suppose I want to release some software but I either don't want to or
> cannot (my house burned down 10 years ago and I lost the source
> scenario) release source code for it.
>
> Is it still possible for (le
Bernd Jendrissek writes:
> Suppose I want to release some software but I either don't want to or
> cannot (my house burned down 10 years ago and I lost the source scenario)
> release source code for it.
> Is it still possible for (legal) recipients of my software to
> redistribute (potentially hex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(Or however the GPL defines "source code".)
Suppose I want to release some software but I either don't want to or
cannot (my house burned down 10 years ago and I lost the source
scenario) release source code for it.
Is it still possible for (legal) r
From: James Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Random-bits] National Academies to host debate on WIPO webcasting
treaty proposal, Feb 22, in DC
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:53:49 -0500
http://www7.nationalacademies.org/biso/Webcasting_Treaty_Symposium.html
Public Sympo
