Linønut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 21 Mar 2006
16:54:01 -0600:
> After takin' a swig o' grog, [EMAIL PROTECTED] belched out this bit o'
> wisdom:
>> (I am posting this on behalf of Richard Stallman, [EMAIL PROTECTED], at his
>> request. The "I" below is rms.)
> Sure it is.
The substance o
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Linønut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After takin' a swig o' grog, [EMAIL PROTECTED] belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>
> > (I am posting this on behalf of Richard Stallman, [EMAIL PROTECTED], at his
> > request. The "I" below is rms.)
>
> Sure it is.
>
> And I'm T
In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tim Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > (I am posting this on behalf of Richard Stallman, [EMAIL PROTECTED], at
> > > his
> > > request. The "I" below is rms.)
> >
> > Sure it is.
> >
> > And I'm Tony Blair.
>
> Do you have any particular reason to doubt him
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
[...]
> [T]he GPL encourages, rather than discourages, free competition
Yeah, right.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Wallace_(plaintiff)
Poor Dan Tinger.
regards,
alexander.
___
Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
After takin' a swig o' grog, [EMAIL PROTECTED] belched out this bit o' wisdom:
> (I am posting this on behalf of Richard Stallman, [EMAIL PROTECTED], at his
> request. The "I" below is rms.)
Sure it is.
And I'm Tony Blair.
--
Q: Why does a GNU/Linux user compile his kernel?
A: Because he can
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 14:34 +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> The plaintiff has alleged future personal injury because of elimination
> of market opportunity -- an injury that flows directly from the
> threatened market foreclosure:
> “… Said predatory price fixing scheme prevents Plaintiff Daniel
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> < misc.int-property added >
>
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> appealing this dismissal is not going to be too easy, ...
>
> Oh really?
Offer Wallace to lay out the money for the appeal, for a share in the
winnings.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildst
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[the usual unrelated pseudoquotes]
Just get over it. The law, as practiced in the courts, is not what
you want it to be. You should really move on and pick a different
hero to worship. The longer you cling to praising the Wallace
nonsense, the mor
< misc.int-property added >
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> appealing this dismissal is not going to be too easy, ...
Oh really? Judge Tinder just made a dull point that "... reduced
opportunity as a competitor does not necessarily equate to an
antitrust injury as recognized by the courts. Brunswi
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> < misc.int-property added >
>>
>> David Kastrup wrote:
>> [...]
>>> appealing this dismissal is not going to be too easy, ...
>>
>> Oh really?
>
> Offer Wallace to lay out the money for the appeal, for
"We decline the invitation. As the foregoing discussion makes plain,
supra, at 117-118, predatory pricing is an anticompetitive practice
forbidden by the antitrust laws. While firms may engage in the practice
only infrequently, there is ample evidence suggesting that the practice
does occur. 16
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
>
> One of Lex Terekhov's favorite "heroes" looses his "cause":
>
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060320201540127
>
> Mr. Wallace's fourth Amended Complaint was dismissed and the
> Free Software Foundation's Motion to Dismiss was grante
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First off, I'm surprised.
That's Terekhov world.
> I hope Wallace will appeal.
Offer him to pay all the expenses this might entail. Anyway,
appealing this dismissal is not going to be too easy, short of
procedural mistakes, and there does not se
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One of Lex Terekhov's favorite "heroes" loses his "cause":
>
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060320201540127
It won't keep Mr Terekhov from citing various nonsense from Wallace's
hand-ins as legal gospel on occasion. He has been
One of Lex Terekhov's favorite "heroes" looses his "cause":
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060320201540127
Mr. Wallace's fourth Amended Complaint was dismissed and the
Free Software Foundation's Motion to Dismiss was granted. It's
the Order that tells Wallace t
15 matches
Mail list logo
