On 2006-08-16, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am attempting to ascertain my obligations with regards to a software
project I am writing. This project is to be licensed under the GPL, but
it links to a non-GPL library. This library is licensed under the 'new'
BSD license, so it is
Qua, 2006-08-16 às 08:01 +0200, Merijn de Weerd escreveu:
Distributors of GPL code are required to make available the full
source code of all modules, which would include the library.
Please bear in mind that the GNU GPL makes no such requirement as
such. The GNU GPL requires you to do that
Merijn de Weerd wrote:
[...]
Distributors of GPL code are required to make available the full
source code of all modules,
All modules constituting a GPL derivative work (or original GPL'd
stuff).
One must be a total idiot to think that a preexisting BSD library is
a derivative work of the
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Qua, 2006-08-16 Ã s 08:01 +0200, Merijn de Weerd escreveu:
Distributors of GPL code are required to make available the full
source code of all modules, which would include the library.
Please bear in mind that the GNU GPL makes no such requirement as
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Merijn de Weerd wrote:
[...]
Distributors of GPL code are required to make available the full
source code of all modules,
All modules constituting a GPL derivative work (or original GPL'd
stuff).
One must be a total idiot to think that a
Piss off, retard dak. Go to doctor.
Hey Scott, see
http://www.usfca.edu/law/determann/softwarecombinations060403.pdf
and also this thread
http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.misc.discuss/browse_frm/thread/d861b94b44a742c6
(for relevant excerpts regarding GPL Terminology and Interpretation).
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piss off, retard dak. Go to doctor.
It seems like I am already doing quite a good job at pissing you off
without requiring external input, but thanks for the suggestion.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piss off, retard dak. Go to doctor.
It seems like I am already doing quite a good job at pissing you off
without requiring external input, but thanks for the suggestion.
Man oh man, you're really krank. It doesn't
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piss off, retard dak. Go to doctor.
It seems like I am already doing quite a good job at pissing you off
without requiring external input, but thanks for the suggestion.
I won't plonk you this time, idiot. Keep embarrassing yourself. MySQL
won on trademark portion but lost on the GPL portion (which had nothing
to do with trademarks) of its claim for preliminary injunctions.
http://pacer.mad.uscourts.gov/dc/opinions/saris/pdf/progress%20software.pdf
--
the
http://trends.newsforge.com/comments.pl?sid=58048cid=129527
(a comment regarding Torvalds' comments on GPLv3 committees refuted)
--
Re:Cutting off nose to spite face (Score:0)
By Anonymous Reader on 2006.08.06 12:40 (#129527)
It really makes me ill that you RMS brownshirts are so willing to
http://trends.newsforge.com/comments.pl?sid=57982cid=129724
-
Section 3 is not the problem (Score:0)
By Anonymous Reader on 2006.08.10 18:47 (#129724)
Section 1, paragraph 4 is. This section states that modified versions
must be able to hide the fact that they're modified. Read it. Think
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:40:28 GMT
Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example is cairo or freetype considered
a 'system' library, or would I need to redistribute their source as
well? Is a link to their webpage sufficient?
You can consider the complete GNOME framework (everything that GNOME
Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:40:28 GMT
Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example is cairo or freetype considered
a 'system' library, or would I need to redistribute their source as
well? Is a link to their webpage sufficient?
You can consider the complete GNOME
On 2006-08-16, Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One must be a total idiot to think that a preexisting BSD library is
a derivative work of the GPL'd application. Are you a total idiot,
Merijn?
The idiot is the one who can't read. I said that Your application
might be a derivative
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Merijn de Weerd wrote:
[... CONTAINS ***OR*** is DERIVED ...]
Hey Merijn, drop an email to Professor Determann.
http://www.usfca.edu/law/determann/softwarecombinations060403.pdf
and tell him that regarding
--
The first sentence of Section 2 of the GPL
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
GPL because the work as a whole has to be licensed under the GPL,
Man oh man. Go back to doctor, retard. Try another one.
http://www.usfca.edu/law/determann/softwarecombinations060403.pdf
--
2. GPL Terminology and Interpretation
a) Works based on the Program
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
GPL because the work as a whole has to be licensed under the GPL,
Man oh man. Go back to doctor, retard. Try another one.
http://www.usfca.edu/law/determann/softwarecombinations060403.pdf
And another long quote
Hello once again,
Thanks Bob for all your suggestions
First of all, I've been looking for the most appropriate list for my
problem and found this one. If I'm wrong and this list doesn't cover
problems like I have really sorry and I'll unsubscribe immediately.*
I've been searching/googling
On 2006-08-16, Marcin Giedz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been searching/googling web sites to find out one question: is it
possible to use GPL software/part of code in commercial application WITH
VERY visible caption THIS part comes from and is based on GPL
license?
What exactly do
Man oh man, yet another schizophrenic.
Merijn de Weerd wrote:
[...]
requires you to acknowledge the presence of GPL software, but
also to make available all source code that has been derived
*from* the GPL software, if you distribute your software.
I just _told_ you this wasn't about what is
Marcin Giedz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello once again,
Thanks Bob for all your suggestions
First of all, I've been looking for the most appropriate list for my
problem and found this one. If I'm wrong and this list doesn't cover
problems like I have really sorry and I'll unsubscribe
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
application WITH VERY visible caption THIS part comes from and
is based on GPL license?
Only if the work as a whole is licensed under the GPL without further
^
|
derivative --+
It means that THIS part comes from and is based
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
application WITH VERY visible caption THIS part comes from and
is based on GPL license?
Only if the work as a whole is licensed under the GPL without further
^
|
derivative --+
It
24 matches
Mail list logo
