On 2006-10-19, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Drazen Kacar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>You agree never to assert against Sun or its licensees or transferees
>>any moral rights therein.
>>
>> That's void under my local copyright law, but the provision certainly is
>> giving cop
Casper H.S. Dik writes:
> Why is that void in you rlocal law? (Just interested).
In some jurisdictions you are not permitted to give up your "moral
rights".
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
___
gnu-misc-discuss mail
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> > The legally unsound bit was about the FSF "position" regarding
> > dynamic linking.
>
> Which is not codified in either license since
Read the latest draft, moron.
regards,
alexander.
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
g
Drazen Kacar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Eh? But it says:
> You agree never to assert against Sun or its licensees or transferees
> any moral rights therein.
>That's void under my local copyright law, but the provision certainly is
>giving copyright rights away. And then:
Why is that void
Drazen Kacar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> James Carlson wrote:
>
>> Open Solaris requries a joint copyright arrangement. You can read the
>> details here:
>>
>>http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/sun_contributor_agreement/
>>
>> As the author you, of course, retain your copyright intere
Drazen Kacar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> James Carlson wrote:
>
> > Open Solaris requries a joint copyright arrangement. You can read the
> > details here:
> >
> >http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/sun_contributor_agreement/
> >
> > As the author you, of course, retain your copyright
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
> [...]
>> Dan's blog entry quoted a lawyer who's being consulted during the draftign
>> of GPLv3 who said that parts of GPLv3 aren't legally sound.
>
> He said that GPLv3 draft is even worse than GPLv2 which nobody
> unde
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First sale, moron. Wanna have a copy of Emacs (modified)under draconian
> EULA-style contract imposing forbearance from rights granted to "users"
> under the GPL and without an offer to obtain source code? Ten EUROs.
You are drunk enough as it is
First sale, moron. Wanna have a copy of Emacs (modified)under draconian
EULA-style contract imposing forbearance from rights granted to "users"
under the GPL and without an offer to obtain source code? Ten EUROs.
regards,
alexander.
___
gnu-misc-discus
Go to doctor, mini-RMS.
regards,
alexander.
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
[...]
> Dan's blog entry quoted a lawyer who's being consulted during the draftign
> of GPLv3 who said that parts of GPLv3 aren't legally sound.
He said that GPLv3 draft is even worse than GPLv2 which nobody
understands. The legally unsound bit was about the FSF "positi
James Carlson wrote:
> Open Solaris requries a joint copyright arrangement. You can read the
> details here:
>
>http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/sun_contributor_agreement/
>
> As the author you, of course, retain your copyright interest. You
> don't have to give that away.
Eh? But
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> intended by the licensor: yes, the copyright holder has the "control"
>
> There are limitations, such as free (of copyright control) distribution
> of copies lawfully made and free (of copyright control) modification
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> intended by the licensor: yes, the copyright holder has the "control"
There are limitations, such as free (of copyright control) distribution
of copies lawfully made and free (of copyright control) modification,
copying, and distribution of those additional exact co
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > David Kastrup wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >> benefitting the general public
>> >
>> > Hey dak, care to address the following (2nd one below) Dan's comment
>> > regarding th
Qui, 2006-10-19 às 14:31 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu:
> > The FSF does not even "control" ...
>
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt
>
> "the intent is to ... control the distribution of derivative or
> collective works based on the Program."
>
> eh?
How very manipulative of you. A pity
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://floatingpoint.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/off-the-record/#comments
>
> --
> Dan Lyons // Oct 17th 2006 at 7:52 am
>
> Translation: Nothing to worry about here, folks. Just move along,
Dan is replying there to a comment I posted.
Dan's
David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> > [...]
> >> benefitting the general public
> >
> > Hey dak, care to address the following (2nd one below) Dan's comment
> > regarding the "public"?
>
> Just a rant, and obviously so.
http://
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> benefitting the general public
>
> Hey dak, care to address the following (2nd one below) Dan's comment
> regarding the "public"?
Just a rant, and obviously so. The FSF does not even "control"
further development
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> benefitting the general public
Hey dak, care to address the following (2nd one below) Dan's comment
regarding the "public"?
http://floatingpoint.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/an-open-source-ceo-on-the-gplv3/#comments
--
Crosbie Fitch // Oct 18th 2006 at 4:03
"Mike Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On a related subject, we have developed a kernel mode driver for our
> Microsoft Wireless Optical Mice with Tilt Wheel Technology,
> complete with device file in /dev and all needed ioctls necessary
> for querying signal strength, battery life status, and ot
Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2006-10-18, Mike Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> (4) In other places they claim they're doing this because GNU,
>> Debian, and the BSDs are requiring copyright transfer as well
>> [1]. Well I know that some GNU projects recommend it (emacs,
>> libst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2006-10-18, Mike Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (4) In other places they claim they're doing this because
> GNU, Debian, and the BSDs are requiring copyright transfer as
> well [1]. Well I know that some GNU projects recommend it (emacs,
> libstd
23 matches
Mail list logo