Selected comments from groklaw visitors
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070519090322431
(Moglen's Slides and Talk on SUSE Vouchers & GPLv3 Available)
--
Doubt it, there are 2 gotchas.
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 19 2007 @ 11:38 AM EDT
Firstly it is FAR from clear tha
David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
> >>
> >> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > Given that MS vouchers don't contain any code whatsoever, what does
> >> > it have to do with copyright to begin with?
> >>
> >> C
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
>>
>> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Given that MS vouchers don't contain any code whatsoever, what does
>> > it have to do with copyright to begin with?
>>
>> Copyright law prohibits a lot more than co
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
[...]
> So in that particular case, supporting Microsoft actually benefitted
> Free Software.
And how does the SCOTUS conclusion that
A copy of Windows, not Windows in the abstract, qualifies as a
"component" under §271(f)
benefits Free Software, dear mini-
Sáb, 2007-05-19 às 17:29 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu:
> And you're just stupid. Well, when are we going to see Eben finally
> going to court against Microsoft? Interestingly, his latest amicus
> was in support of Microsoft in the case that saved MS billions in
> current (no less than 60% o
Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Given that MS vouchers don't contain any code whatsoever, what does
> > it have to do with copyright to begin with?
>
> Copyright law prohibits a lot more than copying.
It's always funny to see GNUtians ("free as in
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Given that MS vouchers don't contain any code whatsoever, what does
> it have to do with copyright to begin with?
Copyright law prohibits a lot more than copying.
You're not that naive.
--
Ciarán O'Riordan __ \ http://fsfeurope.
