From: Heow Eide-Goodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:46:52 -0400
Please join us for our next meeting on Tuesday, June 12th from 7:00
to 9:00 at Trinity Lutheran Church.
"Anton Unplugged: Pontifications of the R6RS Process" :-)
Anton van Straaten,
Seg, 2007-06-11 às 10:37 -0500, rjack escreveu:
> Using anything beside a Free Software Foundation approved license is the
> the equivalent of clubbing innocent baby seals.
>
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070611082734557
Hah, how quickly you transform
Microsoft clubbing the Free
Seg, 2007-06-11 às 17:31 +, sourceview escreveu:
> I must take exception to your initial ideological statement
> (assumption of fact not proven) which states that "most open source
> software is gpled." I wholeheartedly disagree, and if we were to use
> precise quantitative terms, the figure w
On Jun 9, 5:47 am, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.informationweek.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199902779
>
> --
> Pick YourOpenSourcePoison: Microsoft's Patent Claims Or GPLv3
>
> Controversy swirls around the revised General Public License, and
> Microsoft keeps
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
On 2007-06-10, Lee Hollaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But the thing I was thinking about if the House bill had passed was that
any contribution by a government contractor (like a university research
project) would be in the public domain. How
Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
>
> On 2007-06-10, Lee Hollaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But the thing I was thinking about if the House bill had passed was that
> > any contribution by a government contractor (like a university research
> > project) would be in the public domain. How might that a
