CT> I am thinking of releasing the version of the allocator I
CT> submitted to Sun Microsystems under the GPL license
CT> for use in free software only.
CT>
CT> Humm... I think I will use the following license instead of GPL:
CT>
CT> http://appcore.home.comcast.net/vzoom/vzoom_personal_licence.pdf
"J de Boyne Pollard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CT> I am thinking of releasing the version of the allocator I
CT> submitted to Sun Microsystems under the GPL license
CT> for use in free software only.
CT>
CT> Humm... I think I will use the following license instea
"Chris Thomasson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can I download Hoard, make some changes, post the source code free of
> charge,
Yes, because it's licensed under the GPL.
> and charge a fee for a commercial product that uses a function
> offered by the compiled binary of the modified source code
CT> Can I download Hoard, make some changes, post the source
CT> code free of charge, ...
AW> Yes, because it's licensed under the GPL.
CT> ... and charge a fee for a commercial product that uses a
CT> function offered by the compiled binary of the modified
CT> source code?
AW> Not under the GPL
J de Boyne Pollard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> CT> Can I download Hoard, make some changes, post the source
> CT> code free of charge, ...
>
> AW> Yes, because it's licensed under the GPL.
>
> CT> ... and charge a fee for a commercial product that uses a
> CT> function offered by the compiled bi
"Anthony Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
J de Boyne Pollard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CT> Can I download Hoard, make some changes, post the source
CT> code free of charge, ...
AW> Yes, because it's licensed under the GPL.
CT> ... and charge a fee for a
"Chris Thomasson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
I was thinking of charging a fee for a commercial product and posting
full-source code of all the modified GPL code it uses for free.
Would GPL force me to provide the source code for an entire commercial
prod
On Oct 9, 8:18 am, rjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kenneth P. Turvey wrote:
> > I'm looking for examples of software licenses that allow the end user
> > to redistribute copies under the GPL after a specified amount of time
> > has passed. I think that Ghostscript used to be licensed like this,
Hi.
Would it be possible to construct a Free (note the capital "F")
operating system that would be capable of meeting all the UNIX
standards (POSIX, SUS, etc.) precisely enough to be able to be
certified by The Open Group as UNIX(R), ie. "real Unix" (you need
certification to even call a system "U
mike3 writes:
> Would it be possible to construct a Free (note the capital "F") operating
> system that would be capable of meeting all the UNIX standards (POSIX,
> SUS, etc.) precisely enough to be able to be certified by The Open Group
> as UNIX(R)...
Any major Linux distribution could qualify,
"Chris Thomasson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If GPL forces me to provide the source-code of any software that links to
'libgplmod' then you would have to rely on the following:
"J de Boyne Pollard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Cox writes:
> (1) Can I dynamically link my application with free libraries already
> present on the target system, even if they're GPL'ed? (specifically,
> libbfd, part of binutils, I believe; and gdbm)
Not without first consulting a good copyright lawyer experienced in Free
Software law.
12 matches
Mail list logo
