On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 11:54:03 -0800, mike3 wrote:
> On Dec 5, 6:57 am, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Noah Slater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > On 05/12/2007, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> I think it is enough to feed the trolls with a reference.
>>
>> > I don't t
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 18:11:34 -0800, mike3 wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I saw this:
>
> http://www.linux-gamers.net/modules/smartsection/makepdf.php?itemid=79
>
> Note:
>
> "It's not as if the various manufacturing companies don't have very
> good reasons for keeping the code
> and specifications closed. T
From: Jim Gleason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: NYLUG Announcements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:45:01 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [nylug-announce] WEDNESDAY Dec. 12th: NYLUG presents Alec Istomin
from SWSoft on OpenVirtuozzo, Virtuozzo, Parallels and more
Reply-To: Announcements
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Courtesy of Groklaw...
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
On 2007-12-08, Bruce Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The GPL's track record has been and continues to be 100% enforceable.
I've never seen a US case involving the GPL come to a verdict.
T
Courtesy of Groklaw...
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>
> Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> >
> > On 2007-12-08, Bruce Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The GPL's track record has been and continues to be 100% enforceable.
> >
> > I've never seen a US case involving the GPL come to a verdict.
>
> There
John Hasler wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > "Plaintiffsâ copyrights are unique and valuable property whose market
> > value is impossible to assess"
> >
> > -- SOFTWARE FREEDOM LAW CENTER, INC.
>
> Noah Slater writes:
> > What does this mean?
>
> Google "
Noah Slater wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:12:42AM -0800, Keith Thompson wrote:
> > Your use of the phrase "the system" seems to imply that only one
> > system is being discussed. Are you assuming that a system containing
> > the Linux kernel (often referred to as GNU/Linux) and a similar
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:12:42AM -0800, Keith Thompson wrote:
> Your use of the phrase "the system" seems to imply that only one
> system is being discussed. Are you assuming that a system containing
> the Linux kernel (often referred to as GNU/Linux) and a similar system
> containing the Hurd k
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The GNU project named the system GNU, and that is why it should be
> called GNU, it is that simple. If you create a deriviate of BSD, it
> does not magically stop being BSD.
Your use of the phrase "the system" seems to imply that only one
system is
