In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Andy Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And someone suggested
> elsewhere on this list that big companies rarely sue each other because
> they infringe patents all the time so avoid having a knockdown drag out
> fight for no good reason?
Or they establish blanket
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 03:07:58 +, Tim Smith wrote:
> On 2007-12-11, Andy Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you replace 'companies' with 'large companies' (who have the resources
>> to lobby government, and the money to pay lawyers to enforce their
>> patents), it makes more sense. Individu
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 03:07:58 +, Tim Smith wrote:
> On 2007-12-11, Andy Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you replace 'companies' with 'large companies' (who have the resources
>> to lobby government, and the money to pay lawyers to enforce their
>> patents), it makes more sense. Individu
On 2007-12-11, Andy Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you replace 'companies' with 'large companies' (who have the resources
> to lobby government, and the money to pay lawyers to enforce their
> patents), it makes more sense. Individually some of them might want to get
> out of it, but over t
Andy Baxter wrote:
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 11:54:03 -0800, mike3 wrote:
On Dec 5, 6:57 am, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Noah Slater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On 05/12/2007, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it is enough to feed the trolls with a reference.
I don't
Andy Baxter wrote:
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 18:11:34 -0800, mike3 wrote:
Hi.
I saw this:
http://www.linux-gamers.net/modules/smartsection/makepdf.php?itemid=79
Note:
"It's not as if the various manufacturing companies don't have very
good reasons for keeping the code
and specifications closed. T
