mike3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Feb 1, 6:40 am, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> mike3 writes:
>> > But if it's not Free, then how does that jive with "Gnutianism"'s moral/
>> > ethical codes that says creating and using non-free/"proprietary"
>> > software is wrong?
>>
>> It doesn
On Feb 1, 6:40 am, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mike3 writes:
> > But if it's not Free, then how does that jive with "Gnutianism"'s moral/
> > ethical codes that says creating and using non-free/"proprietary"
> > software is wrong?
>
> It doesn't. So what? Do you think one is required
John Hasler wrote:
mike3 writes:
But if it's not Free, then how does that jive with "Gnutianism"'s moral/
ethical codes that says creating and using non-free/"proprietary"
software is wrong?
It doesn't. So what? Do you think one is required to sign an oath of
loyalty and obediance before bei
mike3 writes:
> But if it's not Free, then how does that jive with "Gnutianism"'s moral/
> ethical codes that says creating and using non-free/"proprietary"
> software is wrong?
It doesn't. So what? Do you think one is required to sign an oath of
loyalty and obediance before being permitted to w
On Jan 31, 10:46 am, Ciaran O'Riordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mike3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is the software they then develop for those companies Free software,
> > however?
>
> Sometimes yes, sometimes no.
But if it's not Free, then how does that jive with "Gnutianism"'s
moral/
ethic
